Deity Existence

[Vasu]

*Sigh* God is the one special exception.

Any reason why? Like I said, this is a logical fallacy known as special pleading.

And we WILL know when we're dead, because if you just rot away, you'll be right, but if we end up going to heaven, i'll be right.

Whatever you say. I don't believe in an afterlife, so this is meaningless to me.

Honestly, this discussion is getting to the point where we're running in circles and covering the same old ground... i think im gonna just stop posting...

Go ahead, I know why you want to stop posting.

[Hraesvelg]

Going off track a bit, although I criticize Quantum Physics for being mainly theories, they have shown that a human "soul" could exist after a person has died. Though the soul to them is nothing but a series of electrical charges and energies, they still claim a "soul" can exist outside of the body.

The question is, for how long?

[Jikanu]

Go ahead, I know why you want to stop posting.

Why are you suggesting i want to stop? im just getting bored of going over the same old topics over and over with you again. it's getting quite... circular.

[Vasu]

You said, "I think I'm gonna just stop posting", so I told you to go ahead because I think I know why.


In fact you are the one who is making this debate kind of "circular". Because you don't reply to the full post, not just this time, but multiple times in the thread (I can quote them if you like), when I raise the issues you didn't respond to again, you feel I'm bringing up the old argument and using "circular" logic.

[Aidan]

Actually, it was a documentary on TV and it doesn't look like I can find it online.

Guess I should stop watching TV.

[Jikanu]

You said, "I think I'm gonna just stop posting", so I told you to go ahead because I think I know why.


In fact you are the one who is making this debate kind of "circular". Because you don't reply to the full post, not just this time, but multiple times in the thread (I can quote them if you like), when I raise the issues you didn't respond to again, you feel I'm bringing up the old argument and using "circular" logic.

*sigh* if you're insinuating that i've run out of arguments, i beg to differ. and by circular i just mean we're covering the same old ground over again; like, as an example, hypothetically, we'll talk about evolution, move on to the big bang, and someone will bring up evolution; it happened on both sides, and it kinda makes it seem like the debate will be unending. after a week of it, it's starting to get boring, and im just ready to stop, is all.

[Vasu]

I'm not saying that you're running out of arguments. You just don't respond to some points for whatever reason, and when I bring them up again, you feel like we're treading old ground.


For example, right now I've raised the point as to why "god is a special example" is a logical fallacy, that isn't something we've raised before.

I simply said I think I know why you want to stop posting.

[Ariru]

I don't really apply to any of the poll options. D:
For me, it's more like it's a being experimenting with us, to see what's good, like what effects they'll have on the actual being. D:

>.< Like, we're artifical and the people watching our actions are the real "humans". D: Ya dig?

So they test out stuff on us and then use it for themselves once they know it's safe..
Bascially: We're lab rats. o-o

Edit:
(Just for the record, I chose the last option on the poll. :3)
Another note: I totally missed the actual discussion, I'm sad now. D;

[Jikanu]

I'm not saying that you're running out of arguments. You just don't respond to some points for whatever reason, and when I bring them up again, you feel like we're treading old ground.


For example, right now I've raised the point as to why "god is a special example" is a logical fallacy, that isn't something we've raised before.

I simply said I think I know why you want to stop posting.

He's a special case because he's the first creator.

[Ralath]

:/

That's that not really an argument. That's a cop-out.