Deity Existence

**Vasu** · 04-20-2009, 03:06 AM

You said, "I think I'm gonna just stop posting", so I told you to go ahead because I think I know why.

In fact you are the one who is making this debate kind of "circular". Because you don't reply to the full post, not just this time, but multiple times in the thread (I can quote them if you like), when I raise the issues you didn't respond to again, you feel I'm bringing up the old argument and using "circular" logic.

Jikanu · 04-20-2009, 02:39 PM

Originally Posted by Vasu

You said, "I think I'm gonna just stop posting", so I told you to go ahead because I think I know why.

In fact you are the one who is making this debate kind of "circular". Because you don't reply to the full post, not just this time, but multiple times in the thread (I can quote them if you like), when I raise the issues you didn't respond to again, you feel I'm bringing up the old argument and using "circular" logic.

*sigh* if you're insinuating that i've run out of arguments, i beg to differ. and by circular i just mean we're covering the same old ground over again; like, as an example, hypothetically, we'll talk about evolution, move on to the big bang, and someone will bring up evolution; it happened on both sides, and it kinda makes it seem like the debate will be unending. after a week of it, it's starting to get boring, and im just ready to stop, is all.

**Vasu** · 04-20-2009, 03:29 PM

I'm not saying that you're running out of arguments. You just don't respond to some points for whatever reason, and when I bring them up again, you feel like we're treading old ground.

For example, right now I've raised the point as to why "god is a special example" is a logical fallacy, that isn't something we've raised before.

I simply said I think I know why you want to stop posting.

Jikanu · 04-20-2009, 11:32 PM

Originally Posted by Vasu

I'm not saying that you're running out of arguments. You just don't respond to some points for whatever reason, and when I bring them up again, you feel like we're treading old ground.

For example, right now I've raised the point as to why "god is a special example" is a logical fallacy, that isn't something we've raised before.

I simply said I think I know why you want to stop posting.

He's a special case because he's the first creator.

**Ralath** · 04-20-2009, 11:53 PM

:/

That's that not really an argument. That's a cop-out.

Jikanu · 04-21-2009, 12:00 AM

No, it's simply theory on his nature. there's no scientific way of proving it, so it's only explainable that it has to be his nature.

Do you have scientific proof of LACK of an existence of a deity?

**Ralath** · 04-21-2009, 12:12 AM

Originally Posted by Jikanu

No, it's simply theory on his nature. there's no scientific way of proving it, so it's only explainable that it has to be his nature.

Well, sure. We can theorize that that animals live off oxygen because they're special. We can theorize that the sun revolves around the earth because it's special. We can theorize that the earth is flat because it's special. Thankfully, we didn't.

Quote:

Do you have scientific proof of LACK of an existence of a deity?

This was explained a long time ago. Re: Proving a negative.