Remember, you MUST register to post on the Fiesta Fan forums. It's completely free to join. Just click HERE to become a member for free!


REGISTER NOW TO REMOVE ALL ADS ON THIS FORUM!

View Poll Results: Should Falcomist be permanently banned?
Yes. 8 9.30%
No. 78 90.70%
Voters: 86. You may not vote on this poll

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 05-05-2008, 03:20 AM   #11
Ralath
Bbang ggoo ddong ggoo

 
Ralath's Avatar
 
Tournaments Won: 36

Posts: 3,677
Ralath is a splendid one to beholdRalath is a splendid one to beholdRalath is a splendid one to beholdRalath is a splendid one to beholdRalath is a splendid one to beholdRalath is a splendid one to beholdRalath is a splendid one to behold
Send a message via MSN to Ralath

But if you really want to get legal, I present:

Roth v. United States

Basically:
  1. Obscenity is not protected by the U.S. Constitution
  2. Obscenity is defined by community standards.

But even if you do go on to read to the bottom a little further about Miller v. California (which I hope you do), it says that obscenity is protected under the First Amendment unless distributed to minors and unwilling third parties.

Falcomist broadcast his speech into public. Therefore, First Amendment does not protect him.

Ahem.

:3
__________________


Last edited by Ralath; 05-05-2008 at 03:23 AM..
Ralath is offline  
 


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:36 PM.
Design by Vjacheslav Trushkin, color scheme by ColorizeIt!.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.