|
Quote:
|
|
Fighting fighters is actually the easier of the 3 tasks (a mage can dispose of one rather quickly even in no hp/sp battles, and with slow we can kite them to death easily), but when it comes to against archers and clerics we are doomed. Even with our debuff/drain/steal clerics can easily handle them due to our cast time, ps it takes roughly 6 wacks from a cleric to finish a mage off. As with archers... they're the class meant to deal highest damage to a single target and have decent evasion/defense against most classes. (not even rare to see fighters missing them close to 100% of the time).
|
U haven't fought a good fighter yet have you
, saying we are the easiest OMG THIS MAKES ME MAD
Up until level 60 mages are easy pray when 1 on 1, slow yes u will slow the fighter down BUT U DON"T ALWAYS succed in slowing down the Fighter, THE MOMENT u face the fighter U R DEAD 100% i guarantee u that. ALSO keep in mind that while no hp pots is a good rule NO HP stones is ridicolous because YES fighters need to get close while receiving hits. SO no hp stones is a dumb rule to follow, yes at level 60+ if u dont use hp pots or stones yes mages will win against all classes besides Archers prolly, yet if u both use just stones your chances will be close to 0% of winning an equally skilled fighter of the same level.
DON't take this the wrong way, again mages are a great class but they are not meant for 1v1 in wars, they are meant for support fire.
THE HORROS NOW I"M MAD
Threaded Mode