Mikey's suggestions

[Amber_Bamber]

Okay great, But they act like they're mad and they gave him infractions because they were mad. Maybe restating why they got infractions would clear more things up.


and can somebody tell me what is so BAD about double posting?

[iDerrick]

Okay great, But they act like they're mad and they gave him infractions because they were mad. Maybe restating why they got infractions would clear more things up.


and can somebody tell me what is so BAD about double posting?

I don't think you're reading properly. He was infracted for double posting. Not because the mods were mad.

[Loveless]

Mikey isn't an idiot. He just chooses not to comply with the rules set by the forums.

He knows exactly why he received them. Most with half a brain will know why they have received a warning and/or infraction. It gives them a link to their offending post.

[Hazu]

Hey, a month ago i started the whole favoritism thing, You told me to stop, I carried on with it. I did not get an infraction, Yet my friend did for doing the same exact thing as me. That doesn't even seem fair.

Intresting and Irritating.

[iDerrick]

Hey, if Amber wants an infraction, give her one.

[Amber_Bamber]

Sure, I'll take one.
But what did I do wrong

I STATED MY OPINION

Nothing More, Nothing less.


And It SEEMED like she gave the infractions because she was mad.
It wasn't clearly stated.



Also Pebbles, he didn't do that, Did he? It was by accident, Wasn't it?

Annoyance, Yes great reason for infractions. Double Posting > Annoyance > Infraction.

[Hyper]

Actually, I believe it goes 'Double Posting > Against the Rules > Infraction'.

[Amber_Bamber]

k thnx for correcting me.

(:

[Loveless]

Should also read what Spirit said a page ago.

[Pebbles]

I don't think it's bad, prolly just an annoyance. Like (each number is a diff post):

1. I
   
   
   
2. Like
   
   
   
3. Pie
   
   
   
4. and
   
   
   
   
   
5. cookies
   
   
   
   
   
6. and cake
   
   
   
7. and
   
   
   
   
   
   
8. etc.