Full End Mage vs Full End Fighter

[SpeedySnail]

Oh ok i know wat is PvE now xD.

[Nana]

if you crunch the numbers, or even do simple theorycraft, a full end fighter benefits more than a full end mage.

suppose a fighter (lvl 60) with a shield takes 100 dmg each(without his END)
from 10 mobs that attack at a rate of 1.0/sec.

1000 dmg per second.

the 75 end protects 37 actual dmg from the mobs attacking you. with full end, they deal 63 dmg each.

630 dmg per second, 370 dmg saved per second, roughly 1/3rd of the damage. also keep in mind that a shield is equipped, which give the full END fighter a black rate. mages never block.

suppose a mage (lvl 60) takes 200 dmg each(without his END)
from 10 mobs that attack at a rate of 1.0/sec.

2000 dmg per second.

the 75 end protects 37 actual dmg from the mobs attacking you. with full end, they deal 163 dmg each.

1630 dmg per second. 370 dmg saved per second, but 18.5% of the damage.


so statistically, fighters benefit more. you definitely see more full END fighters than full END mages. last time i saw a full END mage in apoline was back in 79 cap.

[Sk00ter1987]

Depends on the level of the characters. Full End fighters are good but mage will still do a lot of damage especially if they are high enough level to "drain sp". I myself am a mage but I see no point in full end mage.

[SpeedySnail]

Oh yea i forgot to consider the point that full end fighter can block...but wat if the gull end fighter use a 2H weapon(which is a little impossible but oh well...).