so that is why my computer has been going slow....

[Hessah]

I'm not sure how it worked, but sites that haven't been rated / have very low number of rating are marked as ?

I think I've avoided a lot more dangerous sites, than I have missed by false negatives (if that made sense?)

I tried rating my work website coz it's on ? and i know it's not dangerous.. but it didnt change anything LOL I think a site needs a certain number of ratings for it to register =/

[Phantom Badger]

Stop downloading Porn. Watch it online like everyone else. >.>

[Sparkeh]

Awww poor cillia D:

Get Mcafee site advisor in bela's sig...and try putting a scheduled scan...So it can check between once and a while o:

Lol @ bdex.

[Zodiac]

well he has a point

[Sparkeh]

Who? o:

[lamchopz]

Hmm... Interesting addon. I might give it a shot. It's a really great idea, but I'm not sure how well it goes in practice since it's reliant on user ratings.

A little worried about false positives from people just because they might not like a site for arbitrary reasons. A lot of the negative reviews of the addon are complaints of just that sort of thing. Can't hurt to try it out though.

WoT doesn't just rely on user ratings but also uses MalwareDomains and other reputable block lists put together by knowledgeable people. Although users can input their opinions, the WoT community often heed advice from a few members who are themselves malware researchers and security experts.

@cilia: Doesn't AVG warn you about dangerous links? Its latest free version has Link Scanner which does just that.

You may want to refer to this comparative test of many antivirus brands. I've been following it for a while and noticed that AVG's performance is not as good as the other free alternatives such as Avast and Avira which also use much less system resources than AVG.