|
|
08-28-2009, 04:41 AM
|
#12
|
Yank me.
In-Game Name: -quit-
Current Level: -quit-
Server: Teva
Posts: 1,503
|
Pervs.
|
|
|
08-28-2009, 04:48 AM
|
#13
|
Blaaaaaah 2 u 2
In-Game Name: Hraesvelg
Current Level: 6X
Server: Teva
Posts: 1,960
|
pervert - a person whose behavior deviates from what is acceptable especially in sexual behavior
- Princeton's Wordnet
You consider sex with girls to be a deviation from what is acceptable behavior? LOL
|
|
|
08-28-2009, 04:54 AM
|
#14
|
Yank me.
In-Game Name: -quit-
Current Level: -quit-
Server: Teva
Posts: 1,503
|
Originally Posted by Hraesvelg
|
pervert - a person whose behavior deviates from what is ethically acceptable especially in sexual behavior
- Princeton's Wordnet
You consider sex with girls to be a deviation from what is acceptable behavior? LOL
|
Fixed.
|
|
|
08-28-2009, 04:55 AM
|
#15
|
Blaaaaaah 2 u 2
In-Game Name: Hraesvelg
Current Level: 6X
Server: Teva
Posts: 1,960
|
So, ethically, what SHOULD we be having sex with?
|
|
|
08-28-2009, 05:03 AM
|
#16
|
Yank me.
In-Game Name: -quit-
Current Level: -quit-
Server: Teva
Posts: 1,503
|
Originally Posted by Hraesvelg
|
So, ethically, what SHOULD we be having sex with?
|
That would be YOUR call (hopefully). My point is, "ethically acceptable" does not always equal "sex with girls." Just because you can, doesn't mean you should.
|
|
|
08-28-2009, 05:11 AM
|
#17
|
Blaaaaaah 2 u 2
In-Game Name: Hraesvelg
Current Level: 6X
Server: Teva
Posts: 1,960
|
You're losing me here. I mean, I understand the concept of "just because you can, doesn't mean you should" but I have no idea what that had to do with discussion about sex. Do you think any discussion of sex is not socially acceptable? My next question would be, where do you live, Riyadh?
|
|
|
08-28-2009, 05:17 AM
|
#18
|
Yank me.
In-Game Name: -quit-
Current Level: -quit-
Server: Teva
Posts: 1,503
|
Okay, I'll do this the hard way. According to your interpretation of pervert definition, deviation from accepted behaviour = sex with anyone besides girls.
Head to Google Images, turn off all filters, and look up Gorenography. Now, just cause it's sex with girls, does it make it acceptable?
EDIT: Gorenography = 18+. I think you can guess by the name what it means...
Last edited by Belaslav; 08-28-2009 at 05:28 AM..
|
|
|
08-28-2009, 05:21 AM
|
#19
|
Super Moderator
In-Game Name: Espei
Posts: 8,305
|
I think you guys can continue this discussion via PMs now.
|
|
|
08-28-2009, 05:22 AM
|
#20
|
Blaaaaaah 2 u 2
In-Game Name: Hraesvelg
Current Level: 6X
Server: Teva
Posts: 1,960
|
I was making a tongue-in-cheek remark that all women are useful for is sex, but we seem to have really gotten into a heavier discussion, heh.
Hell, as long as it's with consenting adults, I really don't care WHAT gets people off, gorenography or not.
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 11:16 PM.
Design by Vjacheslav Trushkin, color scheme by ColorizeIt!.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6 Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
| |
| |