LOL @ google

[Hraesvelg]

You should be able to audit classes at any age. Perhaps this video can break it down:

YouTube- Big Bang Theory Addendum: Part One - The...

[Jikanu]

So you're saying the law of conservation of mass is totally obsolete?

Also, it only discussed law of conservation of energy, rather than mass.

i dont entirely understand the law of entropy, but it said something about a vacuum that could create mass; but could such a vacuum exist before the universe itself existed? if so, what created it?

[Hraesvelg]

You're just going to have to do the research yourself. The information is out there, I'm not going to spoonfeed it to you.

[Jikanu]

So i should research a topic that i have no interest in, and really have no true need for to satisfy a guy on a forum who himself already has the information, but is too stubborn to just state it in basic terms? O_o

[Hraesvelg]

If you have no interest in it, perhaps you shouldn't keep spewing your ignorance on the subject. I can't distill the concepts down into basic terms and if I lay out the concepts in non-basic terms, it wouldn't do much good because you wouldn't understand what I'm saying.

Long story short, read a book, then come back when you've learned enough to talk intelligently on the subject.

[Jikanu]

Just because im not interested in it doesnt mean i dont know a bit about it. Im just asking for one reason why one law is obsolete in such a case. Im taking science classes in school, and i've had ones for the last 9 years of my life. im not completely unintelligible on the subject, and i've thought often on the ideas of time. I dont see what's so hard about countering one single point.

[Hraesvelg]

No you aren't. This entire conversation has been completely disingenuous on your part. We went over minutiae in the Deity thread and it was about as effective as pissing up a rope.

If you wanted to know the answer to your question, you'd seek it out and not wait for someone else to spoonfeed it to you.

[Jikanu]

No you aren't. This entire conversation has been completely disingenuous on your part. We went over minutiae in the Deity thread and it was about as effective as pissing up a rope.

If you wanted to know the answer to your question, you'd seek it out and not wait for someone else to spoonfeed it to you.

Once again, its a debate. if your point is correct, its up to you to provide evidence. all you've provided is vague responses and telling me to find the answers myself. However, if im incorrect, it is, once again, your duty to supply evidence on how and why i am wrong. im just using what they've taught me in school. if that's incorrect, then please tell me how and why.

*Sigh* Regardless, this is boring me, and i have a headache. Au revoir.

[a.L]

Buahahahaha

[Rightclaw]

Buahahahaha

LOL @ you & your sig.