Legals and Humans Round 11 - Page 44

**Manzcar** · 08-13-2009, 11:25 AM

Originally Posted by Hessah

I guess it doesnt hurt to trust Manz?

hmmmm

But wait then would the vote tally be useful?

I will kill whom ever the humans vote for me to kill tonight. So far your winning.

**Manzcar** · 08-13-2009, 11:27 AM

kk gots to go will see you in about 10 hours or so.

**Hessah** · 08-13-2009, 11:28 AM

Originally Posted by Manzcar

I will kill whom ever the humans vote for me to kill tonight. So far your winning.

I'm tied with Esen atm

This is kinda giving the chance for legal to kill 2 humans 2night though...

I want to vote for Blah... but I dont wanna change my "votes" and all so if others also want to vote for Blah then I'll bold my vote for you Manz~

**Blaaaaaaaah** · 08-13-2009, 11:29 AM

Originally Posted by Jackaroo

DE vote:esen

Are you for real? @_@" I was expecting that those who don't think Hessah is legal would be voting for Ralath (or even me).

**Hessah** · 08-13-2009, 11:34 AM

The Blah legal is very manipulative.... =/

**Blaaaaaaaah** · 08-13-2009, 11:51 AM

What did you edit

I'm not trying to be manipulative. Well okay I did ask people to think again if they wanna vote Ralath (or me) over you, but Esen is such a random choice.

**Hessah** · 08-13-2009, 12:05 PM

I was gonna say "Who would I mind drain if I was Lirange" LOL but I thought the answer might end up being me so I deleted it xD

Though I guess he realised I was way too obvious to be mind drained.. so I think Jackaroo's guess on someone out of the blue seems to make sense too...

**Blaaaaaaaah** · 08-13-2009, 12:23 PM

Then again, I'm not suspecting you because you are a likely candidate to be mind drained. I'm suspecting you for how you've been posting. Different reasons @_@" I don't think it's a good idea to suspect someone based on "who would be a likely candidate", because everyone is a good candidate for being mind drained.

**Hessah** · 08-13-2009, 12:48 PM

how many times do I have to tell you I misread your post? @_@"

but if you want to vote for me based on my fail interpretation then that's up to you.. (if you're human.. if you're legal then that explains a lot)

That's kinda why I deleted what I said coz it doesnt really mean anything.. but isnt one way to find the criminal is to think like them?

DE VOTE - NONE

**Blaaaaaaaah** · 08-13-2009, 12:54 PM

Nope, it sounds like you haven't read my replies to it properly. I said that it wasn't just the fact that you didn't read my "jk". I said that if it wasn't there, I didn't think you would take it as seriously (or be as defensive) as you were, if you were really human.

PLUS that did not only apply to the thing about the whole "clever ploy" I randomly made up, but also to that "betting 1c" thing.