Pwn

[Hessah]

Jokes are fine, but ur jokes are offensive and its not funny. if you NEVER have anything serious to say please go to Mountain of Spam.

On Topic: Agree with Lightning. I like your last theory XD

[.o0O0O0o.]

I feel so sorry for your parents. Having to raise a child as dumb as you must've been a real pain in the ass.

This is your joke? Riiight...

[MagesRequiem]

Jokes are fine, but ur jokes are offensive and its not funny. if you NEVER have anything serious to say please go to Mountain of Spam.

On Topic: Agree with Lightning. I like your last theory XD

Then thats your fault. My jokes aren't there to make everyone laugh. Just me. I have plenty of serious things to say but when it comes to topics like these, I don't.

@.o0O0O0o.: Actually, no. Thats an insult. Good to know you can tell the difference. Notice the lack of emoticons? That right there should tip you off that i'm being serious.

[.o0O0O0o.]

Again, its called a joke. Pull that stick thats lodged up your ass out. Anyone who takes my posts seriously needs help. Thats why I began using those stupid emoticons so people wouldn't take me serious. But I guess people like you just don't understand that. And every post you've made towards me is proof enough.

So what's that in bold then? Show me your joke....*taps his foot*

Me > you.

That serious too? I don't see emoticons....

[Hessah]

was just gonna say that... u beat me to it o0o0o0o.... XD

[Blaaaaaaaah]

Stop flaming each other. Now.

[MagesRequiem]

So what's that in bold then? Show me your joke....*taps his foot*

Do you even bother to think before you post something? Or do you just go ahead and reply despite not fully understanding what its directed at? Try reading your post then my post again. Hopefully, if you read it this time, you'll understand it.

@.o0O0O0o.: Actually, yes it is. There are no emoticons in that because there's nothing that really goes with that. Sorry you have no common sense.

[Dynamics]

Yeah, I reckon clerics and fighters are more catered for survivability, whilst archers and mages the opposite. I don't think it'd be correct to say any class is better than one another in PvP at the moment, because most fights are stacked anyway. One guild will have more people, or more people of a substantially higher level. Even in one on one combat, there's no such thing as "3 hit knockdowns" if both players are of equal level, regardless of their class. It's just the reality of things at present.

[.o0O0O0o.]

GWs put a hole in everyone's wallet >.<

[Stryfe]

I've PvP'd...alot and I can say that classes are pretty much even in terms of PVP. In the end, it truely relies on who can pot/stone the most. Fighter Vs. Cleric 1v1 will never end. It's about who has the most patience to sit there and hit the same thing for the next couple of hours.

Now..without applying stones/Pots in the mix, PvP gets more interesting. PvP suddenly involves a heavy amount of strategy, and just spamming whatever you have.

Clerics, will surely have the upperhand in a 1v1 fight without any stones for they can heal and survive for a long time, while they wittle away at their opponents HP. There are of course ways around this. In my experience, I've found 2 ways to actually best a cleric 1v1, though it's pretty hard.

Also, against Archers/Mages, kiting is possible and a truely effective tactic in 1v1 pvp against fighters. As for as I know, since I dont have an archer/mage, I really wouldnt know how to knock off a Cleric 1v1 without stones.

The thing is, 1v1 isnt usually the case, because outside organized fights, there will always be stoning/potting, and thats when it becomes Our Combined Damage Vs Your Stone/Pot HP Recovery and possible outside heals.