The Chicken or the Egg?

[Carmasa]

When God created the earth, and all the planets, he created the animals, not the fetus. -.-

[Hraesvelg]

Is this supposed to be a serious discussion about abiogenesis and/or evolutionary theory? I would expect so, since this is under mature discussion. I just want to clarify before I take this seriously and get into a discussion about these topics, but the inclusion of whatever a Charmander is in the poll makes me wonder.

[Rof]

Is this supposed to be a serious discussion about abiogenesis and/or evolutionary theory? I would expect so, since this is under mature discussion. I just want to clarify before I take this seriously and get into a discussion about these topics, but the inclusion of whatever a Charmander is in the poll makes me wonder.

LOL!

because Pokemon rule the world at the beginning???

and yeah every mature discussion would be fun with you so share your thoughts...

[lamchopz]

Let's start with the Big Chicken Bang theory. -nod-

[Pritcher]

Lol, ahh this old question. Well, creatures were laying eggs long before chickens roamed the Earth, so the egg came first.

More on point though, if you go with the whole evolution of the modern chicken deal, then the egg still came first. We could go into a long discussion on it, feel free, but I don't really care to. It's fairly simple to sum up; something close to a chicken laid an egg, then inside the egg genetic mutations occurred resulting in the first true chicken emerging from the egg. The egg was first.

I don't really want to touch the religious aspect of the theories on creation and all that, but keep in mind that even the Catholic Church acknowledges the possibility of evolution's role in the creation process.

[Hraesvelg]

Well, the simple answer is that a female sex cell (ovum, or egg) developed long before our modern avian known as a chicken. For the sake of not having another long, drawn out conversation about the origins of life, I'll merely say that evolution doesn't exclude a belief in a higher power. Someone I know made this handy guide, though, for people who wish to argue the point of life developing by evolutionary processes:

[lamchopz]

An interesting note on evolution is that we tend to think of it as "survival of the best" whereas the original phrase clearly says "survival of the fittest". "Best" ,"fittest" are relative terms because you are the fittest in a given set of conditions. Take Darwin's finches, for example. In a drought where food is scarce, the fittest is the flock of finches with small beaks so they'll survive. Equally, we ourselves may not have been the best possible biological form in the evolutionary tree, but we certainly had the right environmental favours for our survival.

For me, evolution is now akin to evolutionary genetic synthesis. Random combinations of genes, along with environmental factors, create diversity as we know it.

And to conclude, I think the egg came first. LOL

[Spirit]

Just an FYI -

Although this conversation can take many different avenues, please remember that this is not MoS and all posts should remain mature and relate directly to the topic. All posts not following these guidelines will be moved to MoS, so that the thread is not tainted.

This is not directed towards any particular post, just a reminder, since some posts could be considered "off the beaten path".

[Hraesvelg]

Y'know, I never even noticed which section this was in. How is this in any way a mature discussion? It started off with a poll that included Pokemon. That sort of fails that particular litmus test. I'd say this should all be moved to MoS.

[Spirit]

It could actually be a philisophical discussion, if it stays on track. Not to mention, even mature discussions need a little humor every now and then to keep things in perspective. As it stands right now, if it stays serious, we will leave it here.