KQ partys non existant?

**Sparkeh** · 08-20-2008, 10:13 AM

totally right

ThEsQuIsHy · 08-20-2008, 10:15 AM

small kq like honeying, HAVE TO HAVE TEAMWORK, last one i was in, failed at the first mob -.-, 3 ppl left instantly, i stayed around in the kq for 28mins, doing NOTHING but talking to the remnants

**Sparkeh** · 08-20-2008, 10:20 AM

Originally Posted by ThEsQuIsHy

doing NOTHING but talking to the remnants.

u mean gaint honey and mobs and...what's his name again...yea..guard spearman

rofl

ThEsQuIsHy · 08-20-2008, 10:23 AM

rofl, yep, pretty much

had a real tough crowd (dumb mobs werent laughing at my tricks n jokes

)

**Sparkeh** · 08-20-2008, 10:27 AM

stupid mob

and he's a mob btw he's will stay there forevevr in spiral hill ^^

^^

Blood Raven · 08-20-2008, 01:38 PM

People are self-centered in Robo KQ. I didn't invite a mage but I made a party mostly consisting of 40+ (except for me but I had +9's) and a level 33 mage was invited. I had no objection because I had been trying to find no partied players so I was happy to have a full party. Then one of the fighters messages me ditch the mage and get a cleric or fighter. I said they are all taken. He replied drop him so he isn't a drain on the party healing.

There was two clerics in the party and I should have the right and power to determine if the mage will be a drain on my abilities to heal. He never even got hit till we got swarmed with the samurai skeletons (black -something- skeletons?) I got no problem helping squishes and if you don't believe me look at my siggy.

**a.L** · 08-20-2008, 01:41 PM

I've gone without a party for quite a few KQs. I still get the boss kills. Lucky me.

bloodrops · 08-20-2008, 04:06 PM

@ Blaaaaaaah: Yeah, I've seen that a few times too. My main's a cleric and it has never had any problem getting into a party when other mages or rather low-levelled fighters have to ask to be invited by the others. I mean, what's so good when there are no good aoe-ers in the party? Discrimination against classes = </3

And also, yeah, the discrimination against "noobs"=</3 too. How do they know if a person is a "noob" or not? o.O I've seen a lot of cases where the so-called "noobs" have better stretagies in healing and so forth. UGH gets me so mad sometimes.

ThEsQuIsHy · 08-21-2008, 05:23 AM

Originally Posted by bloodrops

@ Blaaaaaaah: Yeah, I've seen that a few times too. My main's a cleric and it has never had any problem getting into a party when other mages or rather low-levelled fighters have to ask to be invited by the others. I mean, what's so good when there are no good aoe-ers in the party? Discrimination against classes = </3

And also, yeah, the discrimination against "noobs"=</3 too. How do they know if a person is a "noob" or not? o.O I've seen a lot of cases where the so-called "noobs" have better stretagies in healing and so forth. UGH gets me so mad sometimes.

you have a very good point o.o, discrimination is dumb

if anything the proper term is "newb" meaning your a new guy/gal to w/e you doing, "noob" is a term used for knowingly annoying beggars who spam you 24/7

**Hessah** · 08-21-2008, 05:52 AM

About people not inviting low levels / kicking out low levels, as long as they're trying to do something.. i always keep them...

(a low level attackers is better than a high level leecher)

Cant people see that the party buff gets maximised when you have a full party?!?!

i'd have a party full of low levels, just to boost my party defence (of coz, there needs to be a cleric in the party)

so next time someone tells u to kick a noob, tell them they're there to give you more defence....