Legals and Humans [Round 19] - Page 16

kaylaspot1996 · 01-15-2010, 03:04 AM

Originally Posted by Blaaaaaaaah

Does that mean.. Jikanu is a legal?

If kayla is human that means 2 legals voted for Ralath too...
If kayla is legal, then 2 legals ended up voted for me, and the one who didn't vote (Jik) would be the 3rd legal?

Hmm... But we still have to see who's gonna die tonight...

He has been really quiet lately...

Jikanu · 01-15-2010, 03:09 AM

i was busy today. played LoL a lot. I didnt vote for anyone, if memory serves...

Doesnt mean im a legal. If you dont trust me being busy, just have someone log onto league of legends and check my profile. i had 3 matches today... i only usually have 1.

**Blaaaaaaaah** · 01-15-2010, 03:22 AM

You could be busy and be a legal at the same time though.. being busy doesn't mean you're not a legal.

Jikanu · 01-15-2010, 03:24 AM

but you have no evidence that i am, other than me not voting. me not voting was due to an absent mind, though, as i've explained.

**Blaaaaaaaah** · 01-15-2010, 03:28 AM

I mean.. ~~there's no reason for you not to vote as a legal I guess.~~ I'm only speculating cos 4 votes ended up going to Ralath which could well possibly be by the 4 humans.. and since you didn't vote then you could be legal. That' only given that the legals didn't vote with us for Ralath.

And there's no such thing as "evidence" in this game. It's all by guesses. We only have "evidences" if we have another special human role to prove it.

Jikanu · 01-15-2010, 03:35 AM

If i was a legal, i would've clearly voted for either you or ralath, in hopes of saving my own ass or saving that of ralath. It would be unreasonable to think i was a legal.

And if there's no evidence at all, why couldnt the legal be you, or kayla? Both of you profoundly express that you voted for ralath, which signals towards taking the self-saving theory; however, you're both quite quick to point the finger at me, as well. Its quite willy-nilly, as they say, seeing as we only have one strike left. Almost as if you want to get it done as quickly as possible.

Therein lies SOME sort of evidence.

Personally, i would think it's either both of you or kaya. Kayla's subtle nudges towards medont make her stand out, but are strong enough to get an innocent voted off. Furthermore, she's backing a theory quite quickly, and without any hesitation whatsoever. Not quite a "human" act when we're on our last thread.

Also, kayla thinks its me because i've been quiet; however, so has secbro. Does that not signal towards her either A. Protecting him or B. aiming at me simply because im an easy target, using baseless evidence to support her claims?

**Blaaaaaaaah** · 01-15-2010, 04:03 AM

I'm still sus of secbro.. !!

I'm a little suspicious of kayla too

the main reason I voted Ralath was cos of kayla.. I'm suspicious not because she voted for me, but I thought it was pretty important for all four humans to vote together because if we didn't, there would be a chance for legals to tie and kill another human during the day..

But she changed last minute even though no one else said anything about voting me except for Ralath.

Jikanu · 01-15-2010, 04:04 AM

What about secbro makes you suspicious?

**Blaaaaaaaah** · 01-15-2010, 04:06 AM

Originally Posted by Jikanu

If i was a legal, i would've clearly voted for either you or ralath, in hopes of saving my own ass or saving that of ralath. It would be unreasonable to think i was a legal.

And if there's no evidence at all, why couldnt the legal be you, or kayla? Both of you profoundly express that you voted for ralath, which signals towards taking the self-saving theory; however, you're both quite quick to point the finger at me, as well. Its quite willy-nilly, as they say, seeing as we only have one strike left. Almost as if you want to get it done as quickly as possible.

Therein lies SOME sort of evidence.

Personally, i would think it's either both of you or kaya. Kayla's subtle nudges towards medont make her stand out, but are strong enough to get an innocent voted off. Furthermore, she's backing a theory quite quickly, and without any hesitation whatsoever. Not quite a "human" act when we're on our last thread.

Also, kayla thinks its me because i've been quiet; however, so has secbro. Does that not signal towards her either A. Protecting him or B. aiming at me simply because im an easy target, using baseless evidence to support her claims?

I didn't see this edit before I made my post.

I have to be suspicious of everyone.. there's no way I can absolutely trust anyone.

And like I said, there is either evidence or no evidence. There's no such thing as "some sort of evidence". If it's "some sort of evidence", it's called a guess. I don't think there's any point in asking for evidence unless there's special human role in the game that can confirm this.

**Blaaaaaaaah** · 01-15-2010, 04:07 AM

Originally Posted by Jikanu

What about secbro makes you suspicious?

1. He was quick at jumping on you when you made a post about being suspicious of Triumph.
2. Like Helion said, he's been jumping from one person to another.