The Trial (Round One

**Hessah** · 08-18-2009, 05:30 AM

So did Jik tell the witness bits and pieces and u guys made up a story using those bits and pieces?

Jackaroo · 08-18-2009, 05:35 AM

i'd assume everybody would get told what they know like what the witness saw only me and jik know the full story and i feel so special

**Hessah** · 08-18-2009, 05:39 AM

ohh ohh i thought you were the witness... my mistake

**Loveless** · 08-18-2009, 05:43 AM

Blahs did it.

Jikanu · 08-18-2009, 07:42 AM

Originally Posted by Hessah

So did Jik tell the witness bits and pieces and u guys made up a story using those bits and pieces?

Every witness and the defendant only know bits and pieces. The only thing the defendant knows more than me is whether or not he killed them. i know the rest, and the point of the trial is to uncover the truth.

**Blaaaaaaaah** · 08-18-2009, 07:43 AM

Originally Posted by Jikanu

Every witness and the defendant only know bits and pieces. The only thing the defendant knows more than me is whether or not he killed them. i know the rest, and the point of the trial is to uncover the truth.

But can't the defendant just.. change their mind during the game about the "truth" if they're the only one that knows it?

Jikanu · 08-18-2009, 07:45 AM

Originally Posted by Blaaaaaaaah

But can't the defendant just.. change their mind during the game about the "truth" if they're the only one that knows it?

If someone is the real killer, i give them a minimum amount of truths they MUST say. if they arent, i may or may not give them a minimum amount of lies, but that's only for witnesses.

**Blaaaaaaaah** · 08-18-2009, 07:46 AM

Hm but you said that was for witnesses.

You said that defendant (jackaroo) is the only one that knows if he was a murderer or not, right? So if he's the only one that knows, isn't it easy for him to "change his mind"? It's hard to uncover the "truth" if only one person knows.. if you get what I mean.

Jikanu · 08-18-2009, 07:49 AM

i also know what it is, so if he lies COMPLETELY, i'll force him to revise his statement, or the game will end and he will lose. They need at least 1+ truth. i was saying the lies were only for witnesses; the defendant will always get to tell the truth if they so choose. As long as im the narrator, at least. if someone else takes over, it's up to them to choose how they'll create the game.

**Blaaaaaaaah** · 08-18-2009, 07:50 AM

Originally Posted by Jikanu

i also know what it is, so if he lies COMPLETELY, i'll force him to revise his statement, or the game will end and he will lose. They need at least 1+ truth. i was saying the lies were only for witnesses; the defendant will always get to tell the truth if they so choose. As long as im the narrator, at least. if someone else takes over, it's up to them to choose how they'll create the game.

But that means defendant can still lie, right? So defendant AND witnesses can lie.. except witnesses have a limit, but defendants do not?