Uhh.. PvP KQ..?

**Hessah** · 05-21-2009, 09:12 AM

I hope it's just a test or a glitch.. if they take out the chest there goes my last chance of Ice survival.... I don't even go for the hammer...

**Ralath** · 05-21-2009, 09:25 AM

LAAAAMMMMME.

It doesn't matter if the PVP KQ was no Hammer, no Ice, no Charms, no extenders.

I can't imagine that a Cleric would be able to win a PVP KQ without the hammer. Or even an Archer for that matter (unless they get a godly number of KS's).

At least when they had the Hammer, Ice, Extenders, etc. in, EVERYBODY at least had the chance to win.

**Andromeda** · 05-21-2009, 09:56 AM

Originally Posted by Ralath

LAAAAMMMMME.

It doesn't matter if the PVP KQ was no Hammer, no Ice, no Charms, no extenders.

I can't imagine that a Cleric would be able to win a PVP KQ without the hammer. Or even an Archer for that matter (unless they get a godly number of KS's).

At least when they had the Hammer, Ice, Extenders, etc. in, EVERYBODY at least had the chance to win.

Better idea would be to create a new PvP KQ where you have to rely on the hammer to win as all skills for all classes would be completely disabled. I'm sure most people who created clerics would have realized there is a downside to being the only class in the game with healing power. Although clerics do get PvP skills at Lv 100 with the Holy Knight Class its blatantly obvious clerics are more of a PvE class than PvP.

So pretty much have 2 seperate KQs with different rules

First would be the PvP KQ I said earlier No Charms, Extenders, Hammer, Ice a free for all brawl

Second would be all skills for all classes are completely disabled and the Kings Touch disabled too and you have to completely rely on the Ice and Hammer to win the KQ.

I played a cleric up to Lv 79 I know they are a pain in the ass for PvP but if you want to win based on luck the KQ rules should be divided so one KQ is soley based on skill and the other is based on luck.

**Hraesvelg** · 05-21-2009, 10:00 AM

So, the CS-tweakers would be in the "skill" one, then?

**Andromeda** · 05-21-2009, 10:11 AM

Originally Posted by Hraesvelg

So, the CS-tweakers would be in the "skill" one, then?

I'm against keeping charms, extenders in a PvP KQ without a hammer or Ice wouldnt matter if if CS users joined the latter of the two as hammer is going to ohko you anyway.

**Hraesvelg** · 05-21-2009, 10:17 AM

Hah, fair enough, then. I totally misread what you wrote. I thought you said those with CS should be lumped into the skills group. It is a bit late/early here, I must not be firing on all thrusters.

**Blaaaaaaaah** · 05-21-2009, 10:30 AM

http://www.outspark.com/forums/showthread.php?t=202309

There's a poll here if anyone is interested.

Kaidela · 05-21-2009, 10:27 AM

Lol. How stupid. I only did PvP kq on my archer and cleric, so I guess I won't be doing it anymore~ o.o

**Hessah** · 05-21-2009, 10:34 AM

why make so many version of PVP KQ when.. the old version worked well?!

It's skill to use the Ice and run too... xD

Many people can still kill without the hammer... my mage gets ganged by fighters all the time =.=

It's not always the hammer dude wins... well.. it is when they're charm and extended and people can't even kill them even if they don't have a hammer...