|
Personally I don't find that fair. Not just the fact that a higher score could be DQ'd because of inactivity but because of how the system could be played.
Suppose you have two people in a game in which whoever spends the most time playing will win(I.E. it's neigh impossible to lose).
So the first person plays and gets a score and the next person beats it and so on.
Now let's say person A has played 4/5 rounds to reach a good score to win. The person B plays the 4th round just so he won't get DQ'd and to have(if neither play) person A need to play before him.
Basically if one person has a lower score but doesn't have to play before the other person he could just wait until one got DQ'd...In this sense people would wait the entire round back and forth making one tourney last a month.
__________________
"Do or do not, there is no try." - Yoda
"Put off today what you can do tomorrow." - Anon
"The secret to creativity is knowing how to hide your sources." - Einstein
"Life is a long lesson in humility." - James M. Barrie
Epith
Thieving(Hawk Archer) - 51
ThievingSix(Wiz Mage) - 39
|
Threaded Mode