|
"i mean if the party knows what its doing...one cleric along with the Warrior handles holdin agro the other buffs/heals...lower hp ona cleric but better defense then a 2 handed warrior an you dont see many shield warriors.."
Your comment agrees with what I been saying Tequila, so I do not get what you are trying to object. Like you said in higher KQ's they use both Clerics and Warriors to hold agro, and it seems like you agree with me if there's a shield warrior, that shield warrior would be best suited to hold the agro. Bottom line, of course nothing is invincible, but when someone says invincibility > then taunt, i think that statement is bullshit. Simply because there is a need and use for taunt that will help aid in tanking. If one class lacks that skill then that means that he is not the best tank he can be. He could be a good tank but not the best. Furthermore, if you are raiding a boss monster, in most cases, you want the boss to be in a fixed position for as long as possible. You do not want it running around wildly chasing mages or archers. So I do not get your logic in saying "Oh yeah, and aggros, if they decide to chase a mage will attack clerics if the clerics heal the mage.." I definitely do not want to be in your group Niion because you will probably run KQ's really innefficiently. Watch and game more Niion, you will see the use of taunts and shield warriors in Higher KQ's. Tequila, I can see he understands.
-Remember I am in no way downing on the cleric class. I myself am a Cleric and I believe because of their versitility, are probably the best class. However to do KQ's most efficiently it is best to have a diverse group. IE: Warrior, Cleric, MAge, Archer.
Last edited by Psylex; 06-29-2007 at 04:32 AM..
|
Threaded Mode