View Single Post
Old 05-17-2011, 04:32 AM   #25
crystalblueheart
Vampire Bat
 
crystalblueheart's Avatar
 
Tournaments Won: 1

In-Game Name: crystablueheart,_Nagisa_Furukawa,
Current Level: 83/48
Server: Bijou
Posts: 543
crystalblueheart is on a distinguished road
Originally Posted by lightduty View Post
I love fighters they are good if you are a lone wolf. very class good to help others. Fighters have better attack and defence so natrual intance fighting machine they have lot of hp than sp. you dont have to have party if you are in kq (only to higher lvls)

Now archers are good they arent very good at lone wolf they have to fight monsters their lvl or lower. The one of the best perks you get being a archer is the insane area attack. i was with a lvl 48 archer and she was taking on like 15 enemies w/o my help. i have noticed that archers gets partied faster than fighters. The main reason is because the can pull an moster out of a group of mosters. the are good with parties but not a lone wolf. the other good thing about them is they dont have to fight up close. good if fighting monsters that puts curse on you in short range. they dont have much skills to learn eather

So lets say your party falls apart in kq or something most fighters dont go and get a party they just lone wolf. But archers they need a party and its easy for archers to get a party

So if i were you i would chose fighters for short
and archers for long range
It's not true that archers get partied faster/more often that fighters. Archers are built to solo and can pull monsters out so they can poison it or get most of the damage they need to in before they reach you. Fighters are too basic to me. My friend decided to join after I told him that the ar archers can kite and have poison skils...but then he chose trickster >.<
Although archers may be squishy and have less skills (according to your statement), they have very effective and useful skills like nature's mist. Archers>fighters imo.
crystalblueheart is offline   Reply With Quote