[Blaaaaaaaah]

If i was a legal, i would've clearly voted for either you or ralath, in hopes of saving my own ass or saving that of ralath. It would be unreasonable to think i was a legal.

And if there's no evidence at all, why couldnt the legal be you, or kayla? Both of you profoundly express that you voted for ralath, which signals towards taking the self-saving theory; however, you're both quite quick to point the finger at me, as well. Its quite willy-nilly, as they say, seeing as we only have one strike left. Almost as if you want to get it done as quickly as possible.

Therein lies SOME sort of evidence.

Personally, i would think it's either both of you or kaya. Kayla's subtle nudges towards medont make her stand out, but are strong enough to get an innocent voted off. Furthermore, she's backing a theory quite quickly, and without any hesitation whatsoever. Not quite a "human" act when we're on our last thread.

Also, kayla thinks its me because i've been quiet; however, so has secbro. Does that not signal towards her either A. Protecting him or B. aiming at me simply because im an easy target, using baseless evidence to support her claims?

I didn't see this edit before I made my post.

I have to be suspicious of everyone.. there's no way I can absolutely trust anyone.

And like I said, there is either evidence or no evidence. There's no such thing as "some sort of evidence". If it's "some sort of evidence", it's called a guess. I don't think there's any point in asking for evidence unless there's special human role in the game that can confirm this.