Originally Posted by Ralath
|
That's false too. Opinions can be wrong. For example:
I think that when I hit my head against the wall, it isn't going to hurt. (An opinion, but false.)
Whereas a song like I Am the Walrus has sooo much meaning?  At any rate, that really doesn't have anything to do with actually liking the song. I like both
Plus, those "generic" songs she's singing about are based upon universal themes. It's kind of hard to fault her for that.
I don't even know what that means. Not that that's her fault either.
|
1. i asked that we take this to pm's so we dont disrupt this thread >>
2. I am the walrus was meant to attack those who searched for meanings in their songs, since there was more than one meaning. Take a song such as strawberry fields, however, and there's a massive amount of meaning. She, like any other bubblegum pop'er, uses a formula to create music that doesnt have a unique sound, meaning, or even any insight on the topics they discuss. they express NO emotion, NO soul, NO heart.
3. what im trying to say is that she's just like any other synthetic bubblegum pop diva out there. no different.
4. That's an opinion that can be countered by fact. My opinion can only be countered by another opinion, therefore making it indestructable.
Once again, we should take this to the PM's, so we dont disrupt this thread.