I was getting my hair cut and I just couldn't get the cilia vote problem out of my head. My question who would lie about voting for cilia when they did not? The assumption is it wouldn't be a legal because that would point the finger at the discrepancy but why would the phino do it?
There is only two reasons one is to make them look suspicious and then get voted on thus winning. But that makes it look like they want to be suspicious therefor making people not vote for them. The only other reason phino would lie about who they voted for is to cover up who they voted for because it would make It obvious that they were phino. So what kind of vote would make it obvious that you were phino?? A self vote! If phono voted for themselves they could not say that they voted for themselves. So if we look at the person who is missing a vote they must be phino.
Here is the gambit I propose and LEGALS you better listen up. We need to vote off someone other than hessah because she is phino in this scenario. Than the legals have to vote off hessah. If they don't than we vote off hessah next round because she is legal.
Of course this is all with the belief that my logic is correct.
What say you all
__________________
LOKI Thanks!!
|