Originally Posted by Jikanu
|
|
But you would think that each different person would see something different than the previous though. not 2 different camps.
|
What I'm saying is, if the magnified image was put up on display, the person who saw it first may not see anything special, but when somebody who sees a family comes about and tells them, "See, there's a guy there, and his kid!" And immediately there's a "Wow, you're right!" feeling. Like you said, it can be seen in many ways, but since this particular way is most desirable (?) for religion, it will be the most propagated.
|
Originally Posted by Jikanu
|
|
And you would think that the wikipedia article would say something like "However, the dye was discovered to be such and such in XXXX year by the chemist Whatshisname." or whatever. And from what i've found, though i havent searched long, it doesnt seem to have been explained yet. i'll keep looking though.
|
Well, if it was analyzed again, it might have been discovered. I doubt it's open to every chemist who comes by to observe it.