Originally Posted by Jikanu
|
|
It's not that rules of evidence dont APPLY its just that there's no evidence against it and some evidence which could or could not be challenged standing for it. For example, if i may re-itterate my opening bit of evidence, the Our Lady of Guadalupe portrait's eyes. Vasu claimed it was Rice Writing, with no evidence that suggested that the man who discovered the portrait knew what rice writing even WAS, or, if he did, that he or anyone he knew had time to practice it.
|
And you don't have any evidence that it was done by a supernatural deity either. I didn't claim it was rice-writing. I just said that if people can write that small, they can draw that small.
Going back to my initial question, what if there
is no tangible evidence that he is the murderer? Just "faith"?