[MaxOff]

Okay i will answer on every text passage(is that right right word?) separately without Quoting them, because it would blow my post out of proportion.



Im sorry that my english is not so good and hope u can understood what i meant anyway. If something is unclear: plz tell me so i can correct myself.
And i do think that Wikipedia is a some what reliable source. If u have a better definetion of word "gambling". Please share it with us.

------------------

Your assumption would be correct if gambling means that an random event may happen. But as far as i know gambling means something different. So the whole logical construct is not correct.

------------------

U are totally right, and i guess u have missunderstood me. My point was that the worth of very item u get is defined by the person who gets it. There is no other person who could trade the item with. So the items u dont want, but u still get, have no worth. Not for u, not for anyone.

if u did not get what i mean, read on. If u understood just skip to the next part.

To show u what i mean. We have the black Pegasus and 2 persons called A and B.
A loves the black Pegasus and wants it under any circumstences. B thinks that Pegasus is butt ugly, and he would never use it.

Now both ppl get the black Pegasus.
A got something of high worth, but
B got something worthless.

If u still didnt got it, relax a little and read again =)

------------------

I agree with u. In the ideal case the parents will prevent that there kid spends to much money. But my point was and is that, i believe, Outspark is trying to trick them into spending more money.

------------------

Why do u think so? Do u think an educated adult would play Remi's Rare Finds? Any adult should know that if they are playing a game like these they will always loose in the end. Just like in a casino.

------------------

I am sorry but i dont see a relation to the topic: "Is Remi's Rare Finds a gambling game, or not?" Which was the topic we were discussing right?