[AngellicDiety]

If we were to be strict we would have locked this already.

Just to let you know, this fansite was not created for people to come here and flame each other. What you consider to be "true" may not be considered the truth by another. We merely reminded you all not to create any flaming in this thread, because once you have we will be closing it. We do not encourage this thread to be closed if we can. We allow open discussions as long as it does not create any personal conflicts between members of the forums. I am sure most of us are mature enough to carry out an appropriate discussion without the need of "gossiping" and talking about other people.

We are not restricting the passage of information - but the fact that you had thrown a name out there is at the risk of a flame bait. However, if you had said "But, repeated screenshots of guild war abuse by a certain player has yet to get him/her banned.", chances are we wouldn't have said anything at all.

I just want to make that clear.

Of course this fansite was not created for flamitory purposes. No fansite ever is.

However, you must naturally accept that with any debate there is flaming. Only action need be taken when it becomes derogitory.


Furthermore, that was posted as evidence of outsparks lack of sight.


I'm sorry, but when you defend an argument you do not give wishey washy proofs that can be misinterpretted. Proof must be absolute. There are many guilds who do abuse the guild war feature. Most prominently this individual mentioned.


I did not grow up in your generation, so I do not know what sort of practices or values you hold.

My generation believes to tell it like it is.



Like I said, your term "flame bait" is generic, and the way anything classified under it is handled is similar to the way the community leaders brainwash the community on the outspark forums.


There are bound to be "heated arguments", but to cut them out of a community completely is to return to those "fluffy" communities aformentioned.