[+Tequila+]

isn't 50% too consistent for a skill that has only a 20 second cool down 15 if its trained? The ability has the ability to stun ANYONE..would u really want a lvl 20 fighter's stun being he reason why you lost a fight? just imagine 10 fighters stun locking..

This is just IMO really...

Stun last 8 secs its no big deal unless you have tons of people spikin one target lol . A cleric can tank two people while gettin stunned. a lvl 20 fighter wont be able to land stun on me. He doesnt have the aim to do it

Teq and Niion are right about fighter's being expensive, especially when soloing. We no longer have the repeatable quest's that used to at least help pay for stones. At 106 copper per an hp stone with a maximum of 74 hp stones, a trip in later lvl's will cost you money half the time, with a slight chance of profit if you get lucky and find some silver lumps. This is especially true when considering the fact that fighters burn through sp stones as well.

On stun - it's not guaranteed to work, the only thing it's really useful for in pvp is stunning archers or mages so you don't have to chase them down. Why waste skill points on empowering the duration of stun when damage or sp reduction can be empowered on other skill's.

Pvp - Cleric(lvl 47) vs Fighter(lvl 48) - Stalemate, Teq and I tested this when the battle zone 1st came out. We agreed to stop after 5 minutes when both of us had hardly used any stones.

Mages - they're the best class for soloing at 40+ imo, sure they have low def but their kill speed is fantastic, they're probably about as expensive to lvl as fighters. I'll add that the lvl 45-50 solo arena event was won by a mage with a staff that wasn't even enhanced to +3.

lol that was hilarious one shotted Lune right after that fight xD x_X...dude mages own literally people think they suck because of pvp...but they dont suck in that area either we killed the gms yesterday about 8-12 times due to Fire and Lune nuking and purging. o.0 my stones are only 63 copper each .