Ralath.
49% of your edits do not have edit summaries.
Use more edit summaries. Or I will eat your soul. :sigh: |
Geez D:
Scary much? |
I gettt soooooo tired of writing them.....
Especially when I just write... "changed values" half the time.... Or like yesterday... "add values" @-@ Edit: I swear I used them more than....... 49%..... @.@ |
I was like O____O.
Then I used my deductive skills and realized you were talking about the Wiki edits, not posting edits. /phew More summaries, Rataleth~! |
More edit summaries.
The gray, italicized pre-generated locationally-dependent "edit summaries" do not count as edit summaries. :smarty: EDIT: You owe me lunch, too. As I typed this my lunch burned. :goaway: |
Minor edits and talk pages don't need edit summaries... do they? ._.
|
Quote:
- |
Tisk tisk. I lol'd at your editing reason, Triumph.
So how many total 'mystery edits' are there? And what percentage of mine are? O: |
:0
:uhoh: Those were some effing long guidelines.... |
Guidelines are so long, what a tough read...
I click on (diff) regardless of what the edit summaries say. For all I know, the edit summary could be lying. Practically speaking, it's not something you can successfully impose, hehe. Better to have no summary than to have awful ones if you force it through. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 09:35 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.