Fiesta Fan Forums

Fiesta Fan Forums (http://www.fiestafan.com/forums/index.php)
-   Questions and Inquiries (http://www.fiestafan.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=7)
-   -   Whats the best char for soloing? (http://www.fiestafan.com/forums/showthread.php?t=6196)

Romuald 03-09-2008 09:30 PM

Whats the best char for soloing?
 
Whats the best char for soloing?

And the less expensive to solo :p

Ownage 03-09-2008 09:33 PM

Hard to say.

Either a... Hybrid SPR/STR Fighter with +END equips and good armour, or an Archer.

Yosei 03-09-2008 09:34 PM

I'd say fighter or archer.

MikeyG 03-09-2008 09:36 PM

Fighters , or clerics are cheap to solo with cuz you dont gotta wry bout health stones.

A_Forever 03-09-2008 09:38 PM

I agree with Yos =\

Lilian 03-09-2008 09:41 PM

Fighter or Cleric.

As for which of those two is better, look at these facts:

Cleric is infinitely easier to solo, not to mention more cost efficient BUT you kill sloooooooooow.

Fighter kills fast and isnt neck deep in crap even if accidentally aggroing multiple enemies, however it will negatively affect your money because of stones/pots.

O-mie 03-09-2008 09:42 PM

Archer is not cheap to solo with unfortunately. What you get in the field of battle is usually 90% used back on stones.

Ralath 03-09-2008 11:44 PM

For me, soloing on my cleric is easier than soloing on my archer. My cleric makes pots so it's almost like non-stop grinding for him.

I shroom a lot with my archer so after a couple of monsters, I will go shroom for 10 seconds. But I'm not a big stone/pot user.

Hessah 03-09-2008 11:49 PM

Yeah, fighter or cleric... clerics have the potential to solo at higher level mob without burning too much stones....

while fighters could kill faster but only yellow mobs only... i think anything higher you'll end up burning a lot of stones...

If you have +9 weapon... cleric isnt too bad! but if not... probably fighter....

Yosei 03-10-2008 12:02 AM

Well, when it comes down to it, all classes use up stones/pots a lot when soloing. Thats why I hate soloing on my mage. I use all of my HP stones in no time.

Ivramire 03-10-2008 02:01 AM

I'd say a +9 using Axe Fighter. While Fighters certainly can't heal themselves, mobs certainly won't be alive or remain unstunned long enough to matter.

a.L 03-10-2008 02:05 AM

Archers would be much better at soloing if they had the same evasion rates as their BK counterparts. I think.

Loveless 03-10-2008 02:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wackyboi (Post 104248)
Archers would be much better at soloing if they had the same evasion rates as their BK counterparts. I think.

I can confirm that. xD Up until CP you can kill most mobs before they even reach you because of the stun/entangle skills.

Even without those skills and evasion rate I found soloing with my Archer pretty good. I've soloed with a Cleric once too but it was definitely slow. With my Archer I can go about an hour of non-stop grind with just stones, with the stone extender thing I can go twice as long. :P And cost-wise... wasn't too bad, you'll be making profit in most cases so as long as you're going against mobs your level. Plus, because Archers don't have a lot of skills... you can save up before you buy the next set which was always nice. I save more money on my Archer than my Cleric... gained that first 100s faster.

NotMyWay 03-10-2008 04:02 AM

I like clerics because they have the ability to heal themselves and save money on hp stones.. true that fighters can stun, but they only get their second stunning skill at level 43, but if u can wait, i guess it would be good to keep enemies stunned all the time...

Triumph 03-10-2008 04:46 AM

For cost efficiency, clerics.

For time efficiency, fighters.


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:54 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.