Hypothesis question.
 

What important relationship should exist between the hypothesis and the conclusions of an experiment?

The conclusion answers the hypothesis...

now now be nice, the ... makes me feel like I should know the answer...

?!

that was just a quick answer to your question...

The Hypothesis should explain your thoughts and expectations, the conclusion should include any change in your hypothesis, whether it was right or wrong, and what affected the change in the experiment

Just guessing, but the conclusion should either confirm/oppose the hypothesis? That or be inconclusive. Like in Mythbusters :D

<3

Just don't think Mythbusters is real science. It's entertaining, but you can usually find MANY flaws in their methodology.

Nuu mythbusters is a myth too?~ http://www.laymark.com/i/m/m205.gif

So science is NOT all about explosions? NOOOOOOO

Of course not. There are only so many ways to die...

This but without the "inconclusive".

When you formulate a hypothesis, for practical reasons, it always has to be on either end of the spectrum the middle of which is the Null hypothesis. Thus, the experiment most certainly will either support or refute the hypothesis.

The conclusion must at least address the hypothesis in that way.

Didnt one of the guys die last year???