why is math so painful
 

:cries:
i used to like it, then i got to college

-pat pat-

i hate howwhile studying i look at the first exam and see that hey, i can do a lot ofthis pretty easily and i feel like i've actually gotten something done cause i looked it over so quickly but in reality i've barely scratched the surface of my problems

:cries:

how do i prove that for any natural number n n^4 - n^2 is divisible by 3:cries:

Use mathematical induction!

n^4 - n^2 = n^2(n^2 - 1) = n*n*(n-1)*(n+1)

Since, n -1 ,n , n + 1 are three consecutive natural numbers, one of them has to be divisible by 3, hence your expression is divisible by 3.

LOL, the method I was thinking of was, prove it for n=1, then assume it is true for n=k, and then prove it for n=k+1. A bit more elaborate. :urweird:

so that was a test question from the first exam i couldn't remember how to do (even then T_T). if he actually put it on the final i'd be so happy i might have to kiss you lam (but settle for a hug)


also, vasu, die a horrible death D:<
cause that's on this too and i hate it. i hate it soooo much.

o_o oh you posted again, didn't notice.

freaking induction

I'm unsure if he'd accept that but it's something used liberally in arithmetics.

It follows from this more general statement: For any n consecutive integers, at least one of them is divisible by n.

The proof is relatively painless:

Each number can be represented as nq + r where r < n (due to Euler's integer theorem, or whatever it's called. can't remember now xD)

r is therefore any integer from 0 to n -1

since u have n numbers and they're consecutive, they are essentially:

nq + 0
nq +1
...
nq + (n - 1)

or any valid combination (we don't illustrate this in the formal answer, however).

Normally, you just say since the remainders include all values from 0 to n -1, and there are n consecutive numbers, one of them has to have a remainder of 0, which means the same as one of them is divisible by n.

Again check with your professor if he'll accept this without the burden of proof.

and LOL @ your random rage, Des.

he'll accept the simple one. i'm pretty sure that's how it was said in class i just couldn't remember.

and i live on random rage:angel:

rofl

oh and rub out the "at least" in the statement. It's wrong to put it there, I just realised.:urweird:

@_____________________________________@

:confused:

:lost: :lost: :lost:

:cheeky: :cheeky: :cheeky:

@______________________@

now i have to study induction and invariants before moving on to the stuff i really didn't know but bsed pretty well on the last test:cries:

<3 jason mraz

i need to start revising, too.

good luck and see you soon.:D

and it's not maths. T_T

Biochem... is... [insert a word here to describe too much information]

no need to explain. i have biomed, chemE, and chem major friends. waaaay too much work.

need to bother lam on msn more...

k, got invariants i think. induction isgonna be a pain in the butt.

however if my hypothesis about my brain functions is correct i may be able to pull something out of my butt here

Reading this thread made my brain twich e.o

i don't feel like i've studied enough

I like him too!

Look into your heart and you'll find Love~ Love ~ Love~ Love~

^ I have that song on my phone =D