Fiesta Fan Forums

Fiesta Fan Forums (http://www.fiestafan.com/forums/index.php)
-   Fiesta General (http://www.fiestafan.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=6)
-   -   Test your knowledge of Fiesta's operation (http://www.fiestafan.com/forums/showthread.php?t=12795)

Icy 09-03-2008 05:45 AM

Test your knowledge of Fiesta's operation
 
This post serves to inform, but I also add a poll because I'd quite like to know the populace's take on this :nahnah:

1. Vote 2. Click on the link below for more information! 3. Read the rest of the thread if you wish~

No spoilers please :cutielove:




































Hessah 09-03-2008 05:52 AM

AHHHHHH i voted for the wrong one...

i voted yes i think so, but.. it should be No i dont think fiesta is out of open beta.. (thought the question asked if fiesta is still in open beta -.-)

-clicks on link now-



EDIT: OK... wat's the answer? that doesnt really answer the question... it's been known for a long that that "apparently" hving a fiesta store =/= beta or not...

They've been claiming that they're in Open beta even though they've got a fiesta store...

Ivramire 09-03-2008 05:57 AM

Didn't Euro Fiesta say that they were already moving out/ are out of Open Beta?


Lol?

Ivramire 09-03-2008 06:11 AM

I think most of the belief comes from them having 'Open Beta' splattered across the last few ads they've paid for.


Which I can't find anymore =/


The magic of Open Beta can apparently be used to explain everything?


EDIT: wasn't there a post above before o_o?

Hessah 09-03-2008 06:28 AM

@lvra - yeah that's wat i thought too!!

i'm trying so hard to find it..

the closest thing i could find was Spirit's post from back here:
http://www.fiestafan.com/forums/show...5&postcount=57

June 08... that is waaaaaaay after Icy's article there.. and i'm sure there's a reason to why we still believed that it was in beta all the way to at least Jun 08...

i'll keep snooping

Ralath 09-03-2008 06:28 AM

It's really mincing words.

Fiesta is still in Open Beta because Outspark says it is in Open Beta.

I like Wikipedia's excerpt on this:

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wikipedia
In February 2005, ZDNet published an article about the recent phenomenon of a beta version often staying for years and being used as if it were in production-level. It noted that Gmail and Google News, for example, had been in beta for a long period of time and were not expected to drop the beta status despite the fact that they were widely used; however, Google News did leave beta in January 2006. This technique may also allow a developer to delay offering full support and/or responsibility for remaining issues. In the context of Web 2.0, people even talk of perpetual betas to signify that some software is meant to stay in beta state. Also, "beta" is sometimes used to indicate something more like a release candidate such as the Halo 3 public beta.

The term open beta isn't defined. And I don't think Outspark has ever said full release.


I just realized I might have voted for the wrong one. Can't remember now. >_<

booyah8876 09-03-2008 06:37 AM

Look at any ticket that you submit to a CSR.

It says always to understand they're still in Beta.

>.>;

Ivramire 09-03-2008 06:40 AM

Guess that solves it.

Icy 09-03-2008 06:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lvramire (Post 222655)
EDIT: wasn't there a post above before o_o?

Yes yes there was, you were not seeing things. I removed it and sent it to you instead :nahnah:

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ralath (Post 222666)
It's really mincing words.

Fiesta is still in Open Beta because Outspark says it is in Open Beta.

I like Wikipedia's excerpt on this:

The term open beta isn't defined. And I don't think Outspark has ever said full release.

I just realized I might have voted for the wrong one. Can't remember now. >_<

Now, I wouldn't even dare post my summary on the implication of your source on Outspark's intentions on the official Outspark forum. That will have me chargrilled in 10 different ways.

Outspark's corporate news release said commercial premiere, so either the business sector or the customer service sector of the company is, ummm, not telling the truth.

Ivramire 09-03-2008 06:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Icy (Post 222673)
Yes yes there was, you were not seeing things. I removed it and sent it to you instead :nahnah:


so that's what it was for :zip:


Yeah, you'd get roasted for posting it on there. Don't know why, but a fair number of posters take it upon themselves to defend the 'virtue' of a Business Corporation.

Loveless 09-03-2008 06:53 AM

So we're still in OB or actually out of it? o__o I said no... but yeah...

zzz

Hessah 09-03-2008 06:56 AM

I've said this to Icy.. but I guess i'll say it here too for agument sakes XD

That article dated in November 2007, has said many things that were actually not true at the time...

"PVP zone, guild functionality" were NOT implemented at the time of that post...

Check our responds in this thread from January 08 - HERE

Also... as booyah said... Response from CSR always claim that they're still in Beta:

Check This Post

That was also back in January 08

That article is merely used for them to advertise... its all the gloss for the outside world who hasnt played the game... once u're in... u're in the "beta" loop....


That's how i interpret it anyway

Loveless 09-03-2008 07:00 AM

So then what exactly defines the difference between OB and official release? I mean there are games that are "official" and updates come with bugs still cause it's obviously new content. It used to be that cash shop meant official release but that isn't the trend nowadays.

lamchopz 09-03-2008 07:02 AM

Outspark's version of Fiesta is too unstable to be an official release (I'm not sure about its counterparts). The beta title is designated by the provider: if they think the product is ready to go mainstream, they'll remove the beta tag even though some bugs are still there. I remember playing the first release of Dungeon Lords, which had no mini-map (so I had to explore the terrain with no guidance whatsoever. Was fun, though, since it was like real life exploration), had features that were incomplete (I picked up a ring that did absolutely nothing even though it looked really cool; or only some of the dialogues had sounds),etc. I had to refer to an online guide to help me get through the witch's labyrinth at one point. And yes, the version of Dungeon Lords that I played was an official release.

Icy 09-03-2008 07:02 AM

>We appreciate your feedback and support during our BETA period. We are working hard to make Outspark.com the best internet gaming site ever!
>
> Regards,
>
> Outspark Support
> www.outspark.com

That letter end hasn't changed since the system kicked into action long time ago :urweird:

May it be just forgetfulness on their part to have not changed it? Or may it be just an opportunistic omission?

Whether the game is still in beta or not doesn't matter and shouldn't really. But I think what matter are how Outspark uses this fact and how their customers perceive this.

lamchopz 09-03-2008 07:12 AM

I agree with Icy.

However, it doesn't hurt Outspark to extend the open beta period (I mean look at Google, lol...) because this is a nice game. I guess they know that we really really really like this game so we won't quit easily. Thus, the reality.

Ralath 09-03-2008 07:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lamchopz (Post 222685)
Outspark's version of Fiesta is too unstable to be an official release (I'm not sure about its counterparts). The beta title is designated by the provider: if they think the product is ready to go mainstream, they'll remove the beta tag even though some bugs are still there.

Outspark's version of Fiesta is too unstable... compared to or for what?

It sounds a lot better than the Dungeon Lords game you played.

My general feeling is that Outspark is using the Open Beta as an excuse for any problems people might encounter--not as a term signifying a testing period, per se.

Loveless 09-03-2008 07:34 AM

Counterparts as in the other versions? I'd say they're stable in a sense where they provide prompt feedback on common bugs and have a check list visible to players (that they actually do check off). They also keep people up to date on current issues on a weekly basis. << This is mostly from what I see in Bright Kingdom cause that's the only site I can actually read.

Icy 09-03-2008 07:38 AM

*sigh* I know, lamchopz, many people really, really like the game, and Outspark is certainly playing this to their advantage. I wish they would react more positively to criticisms (umm, I don't think they react at all now) rather than just head off in the direction they destined themselves to.

Perhaps an interview with Outspark's CEOs may enlighten you.

Good business or taking advantage of consumers?
( ^ after writing that, I decided that they gotta go hand in hand, but oh well)

Quote:

Originally Posted by Loveless (Post 222703)
Counterparts as in the other versions? I'd say they're stable in a sense where they provide prompt feedback on common bugs and have a check list visible to players (that they actually do check off). They also keep people up to date on current issues on a weekly basis. << This is mostly from what I see in Bright Kingdom cause that's the only site I can actually read.

They do have an office in Seoul. But the speed at which they respond to gameplay issues is like... A sends representative flying from NA to Korea B activity takes place in Korea C representative takes updated game modules and flies back to NA D finally we get an update. Oh yah, a section regarding specific game issues should definitely be setup. Things like spelling errors that have persisted since CB and character animation issues that have been around for months need to be there 24/7 to serve as constant reminders. Seriously. They don't affect gameplay and don't take long to fix, with no adverse consequences ._.

Ivramire 09-03-2008 08:09 AM

You have got to read the interview link o__o


Quote:

Originally Posted by Interview
And we make it a point to have these game masters be in there, actively running events, at least a couple of times a day in each of the rooms. And they have fan-clubs by the thousands.

And it's kind of cute to watch, because you have all these gamer characters surrounding our game master characters, and our game masters are like: "Ah, I love this job!" And they're coming up to them going: "I love you! I wanna marry you!" And they're like, "Oh! I'm like the hero!" And it's very cute -- and that has our systems guys going: "I want to switch jobs. I want to be a game master!"


Lol.


Quote:

Originally Posted by Interview
Like closed beta 1 testers will always complain because the way they like to play it has already been changed.

-
Right, because they've adapted to it the way that it was.
-

SC: Yeah. That, we're used to. If we take away Korean dresses, and they complain? Well, we'll make it into a Premium Item! They can buy it!


Hmm...


Quote:

Originally Posted by Interview
It all circles back to dating online.
-

SC: Dating! It does, doesn't it? Because I think these games -- when you look at the games that succeeded overseas, there are really three drivers that are common. And I'll euphemize here: One is love -- well, dating -- and one is commerce, and the other is probably competition-slash-challenge.

-

Quote:

SC: But you know, it's funny; our Game Masters have female characters too, and when they go in as female characters, people don't know. And it's funny to watch gamers come up to them and, one of the characters' names is Madison: "Madison, I love you!" And I'm going: "Do they know this is a guy in the back?" But yeah, getting back to the point about MMOGs: Casual games that are MMOs seem to bring out also the chatty side of people. Especially the casual MMOG guys.

And I think I was joking with our Game Masters, and said: "You know what? Instead of being more men-in-tights killing monsters and spawning bosses, how about we have a dance party? Because we can! You know, we have these rich emoticons in Fiesta, so let's use it!"

And it's really interesting, because just like in a real dance contest, you had street crews running through, and people meeting online and practicing. We have an interview with the winners, which are actually three women. I think they're women! But they're asked questions like: How did you meet? "Online." When did you meet? "A week ago. And we practiced every day for an hour, and YAY WE WON!" And you're going: "Wow, see? You don't have to go kill monsters!" So now, we started with something like 80 to 90% male, and dropped a little, but still.

NF: It's about 35 percent female on the site?

SC: Yeah.

35% :urweird:

Ralath 09-03-2008 08:11 AM

Is that number too high or too low?

Ivramire 09-03-2008 08:12 AM

I honestly thought it'd be a bit higher.


But I guess with all the guys playing female characters...you just never know.


EDIT: but this was back in Jan. after all.

Icy 09-03-2008 08:40 AM

Omigod [Tutor]Madison I love you in your kawaii yakuta ~<3

Lol. I still remember Madison from CB2.

Ralath 09-03-2008 08:57 AM

I'm pretty sure Madison is one of SKiNG's alts.

It's his daughter's name or something. I forgets.

Sero 09-03-2008 10:11 AM

Yay! I voted for nope XD

Icy 09-03-2008 11:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Serendira (Post 222729)
Yay! I voted for nope XD

There's no right or wrong answer :cutielove:

As Ralath pointed out earlier, technically the game will never leave beta stage. However, since the commercial premiere was announced, realistically speaking one should expect the game to be regarded with the same, if not higher, expectation as a finished product on shop shelves (and therefore the term beta should not be brought up as a precursor to subsequent facilitation of the lesser blame phenomenon). And then, there's the poll, which shows in people minds it still hasn't left open beta. Meh.

Triumph 09-03-2008 12:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ralath (Post 222716)
I'm pretty sure Madison is one of SKiNG's alts.

It's his daughter's name or something. I forgets.

It was [GM]Break, I think. Well Admin Break now, I'd assume.

Yay American complicated legalities. :cutielove:

The reason Outspark maintains it's "Open Beta" façade so that they have a shield to defend themselves from inadequacies. It's really a "legal" defense; by saying they are in "Open Beta," as Ralath has said, they therefore can claim in that they are still testing, despite the release of premium items. In essence, therefore, they can state that they are very sorry for the bugs, working diligently to fix them, and have Fiesta players' best interests at heart.

Which is why they take ages to fix a simple error that anyone can fix, let alone the developer team. Which is why they took months to fix the relog bug, the bugs that came with the June 9th patch, and why they squabbled fiercely with Gamigo regarding European player accounts.

I would get flamed by the Outspark Self-Appointed Forum Gestapo if I posted there. So I rant and rave here. :cutielove:

Hraesvelg 09-03-2008 03:34 PM

That interview was very...illuminating.

Zwivix 09-03-2008 04:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ralath (Post 222666)
It's really mincing words.

Fiesta is still in Open Beta because Outspark says it is in Open Beta.

I like Wikipedia's excerpt on this:



The term open beta isn't defined. And I don't think Outspark has ever said full release.


I just realized I might have voted for the wrong one. Can't remember now. >_<

This explains alot...

Yosei 09-03-2008 04:29 PM

Tbh (and no this isn't coming from an Outspark lapdog), I don't really care what they call it now o.O its only a game, something we do in our free time, we don't necessarily have to put money into it, and if you do thats your choice, but it doesn't mean you, as an individual, will receive better service now by putting more money into the company. I know a lot of people think Outspark judges people based on whether they're a CS user, but its been proven on multiple occasions that that is not the case. So yeah.. in before bringing CS into their consideration.

I mean.. compared to most companies, Outspark isn't that old (didn't Outspark launch in May last year?). If you've seen pictures of their office on the forums, they don't even have their own building, almost looks like just a floor (point being they don't have a lot of employees in comparison to let say, Blizzard). Of course, this isn't an excuse for them to slack, but at the same time, they don't exactly have the man power(and too many duties per position), Outspark is still learning to walk, they're building momentum, they're starting to be more informing on their updates, and they're starting to get things done quicker.

No ones perfect, and no one gets it right at first, even companies. As time goes, Outspark will probably gain more money, get more empoyees, thus getting better service, and more people working on getting the updates out and fixed if theres anything wrong.

I do know they do like criticism, constructive criticism. No one likes to read or waste their time on "OMG WTF OUTSPARK! You guys are such liars! You say its Beta but you've been saying this for a year! W.T.F! How lame is that???? What kind of company does that??? insertothergamenamehere Online was in OB for a MONTH!"

Of course, a lot of the time on the forums, the members can get a little too defending of Outspark, and start squawking at the person trying to make a point, except for people who post like the above, they kind of have it coming. Then a flame war breaks out, then the thread is closed.

All I can say in the end is... if you can play the game, you like to play it, you enjoy your time when you're playing it, why worry about it? It's just a word.

Icy 09-03-2008 06:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Triumph (Post 222785)

I would get flamed by the Outspark Self-Appointed Forum Gestapo if I posted there. So I rant and rave here. :cutielove:

Chicken~ You're afraid now that you've seen how they roasted me?

You're right Yosei, in that the regular player could care less about what's going on in the company. So long as it doesn't affect them directly, that is. A lot of things like company ethics and management are established with the company from the very start. If they don't get these things straight right from the beginning, there is little hope of any U-turns later. Now I'd say that sloppy responses to customer feedback will ultimately affect gameplay. As Triumph pointed out, updates and problem rectification are suffering severe delays most likely "due to earlier signal failure" (lol that's like the London Underground - I can see quite a few things in parallel). If this kind of things hasn't changed a bit since CB, then one must question the possible causes.

Absolutely, the company is only at its infancy. But should you really treat it like an infant? Their press releases shapes it as an ambitious company. It's only fair to demand from it what it can be, as opposed to being complacent about its status as a budding company.

The funding Outspark received seems to be an appreciable amount. It doesn't seem to me that they're fully utilising it though. Anyone interested in doing some Math with me? :cutielove:

Quote:

Originally Posted by Yosei (Post 222879)
Of course, a lot of the time on the forums, the members can get a little too defending of Outspark, and start squawking at the person trying to make a point, except for people who post like the above, they kind of have it coming. Then a flame war breaks out, then the thread is closed.

Just... squawking? Some get jumped on 9 ways.

Triumph 09-03-2008 08:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Icy (Post 222933)
Chicken~ You're afraid now that you've seen how they roasted me?

Yah right. That certain level 67 mage from Apoline keeps trying to -rep me, but now his little boxes are gray.

I use a drab tone on the official forums. You use too much cynicism, you weren't just roasted, you were burned extensively.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Icy (Post 222933)
Just... squawking? Some get jumped on 9 ways.

Like yourself, nub. Now, play CS.

Icy 09-03-2008 09:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Triumph (Post 222963)
Yah right. That certain level 67 mage from Apoline keeps trying to -rep me, but now his little boxes are gray.

I use a drab tone on the official forums. You use too much cynicism, you weren't just roasted, you were burned extensively.



Like yourself, nub. Now, play CS.

Get off my tail pl0x
Before I chargrill you for dinner

Ralath 09-03-2008 09:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Icy (Post 222933)
Chicken~ You're afraid now that you've seen how they roasted me?

BUahahahaha! Links me plz.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Triumph (Post 222963)
Yah right. That certain level 67 mage from Apoline keeps trying to -rep me, but now his little boxes are gray.

:O

Who?


Oh.

Wait.

Figured it out.

I think.

That didn't take long. ._>

Triumph 09-03-2008 09:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ralath (Post 223022)
BUahahahaha! Links me plz.



:O

Who?


Oh.

Wait.

Figured it out.

I think.

That didn't take long. ._>

You'll find out on officials, lol.

Icy 09-03-2008 09:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Triumph (Post 222963)
Yah right. That certain level 67 mage from Apoline keeps trying to -rep me, but now his little boxes are gray.

Lol. You couldn't shake him off? Wow, persistent.

lamchopz 09-03-2008 11:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Icy (Post 222933)
Chicken~ You're afraid now that you've seen how they roasted me?

You're right Yosei, in that the regular player could care less about what's going on in the company. So long as it doesn't affect them directly, that is. A lot of things like company ethics and management are established with the company from the very start. If they don't get these things straight right from the beginning, there is little hope of any U-turns later. Now I'd say that sloppy responses to customer feedback will ultimately affect gameplay. As Triumph pointed out, updates and problem rectification are suffering severe delays most likely "due to earlier signal failure" (lol that's like the London Underground - I can see quite a few things in parallel). If this kind of things hasn't changed a bit since CB, then one must question the possible causes.

Absolutely, the company is only at its infancy. But should you really treat it like an infant? Their press releases shapes it as an ambitious company. It's only fair to demand from it what it can be, as opposed to being complacent about its status as a budding company.

The funding Outspark received seems to be an appreciable amount. It doesn't seem to me that they're fully utilising it though. Anyone interested in doing some Math with me? :cutielove:



Just... squawking? Some get jumped on 9 ways.

Oh, yes, I'm ready. Now all we need are a few numbers.

Hessah 09-04-2008 12:24 AM

Outspark getting FUNDING =/= PROFIT

11 mil is capital... that they have to earn for their investors... they are a company set up to make money... It would make sense that the 11 mil they received are not free money... it's people giving them capital to start the company, in the hope to generate more return...

just a side that i think ppl misinterpret the money that outspark gets....

Icy 09-04-2008 01:09 AM

What good is the funding if it is not invested by the recipient? No investment equals no profit, which is loss for the venture firms. And these are venture firms, not money lenders.

DarkteK 09-04-2008 01:33 AM

Quote:

It was [GM]Break, I think. Well Admin Break now, I'd assume.

Yay American complicated legalities.

The reason Outspark maintains it's "Open Beta" façade so that they have a shield to defend themselves from inadequacies. It's really a "legal" defense; by saying they are in "Open Beta," as Ralath has said, they therefore can claim in that they are still testing, despite the release of premium items. In essence, therefore, they can state that they are very sorry for the bugs, working diligently to fix them, and have Fiesta players' best interests at heart.

Which is why they take ages to fix a simple error that anyone can fix, let alone the developer team. Which is why they took months to fix the relog bug, the bugs that came with the June 9th patch, and why they squabbled fiercely with Gamigo regarding European player accounts.
Wot, nice argument ^o^


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:13 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.