Bleh. that sucks x.x

But it IS a possibility that it will eventually come out that way? That's at least more hope i had of seeing it than before.

And vasu, you've yet to weigh in on the argument: Which side do you take at the end: Rorschach or Ozymandias?

I've never really decided. Rorschach is kind of right because I don't believe in any kind of compromise either. But Ozymandias did it in a way so as to provide peace as quickly as possible, and I even daresay, in the cleanest possible way. Like that Dr. Manhattan dude said, sacrifice was necessary. At the most, he could have reduced the number of bombs planted, but that's just haggling over the details.

Ozymandias himself questioned whether or not there was a better way after rorschach was killed, though. Perhaps he could've used his vast knowlege to come up with one?

Then again, that's once again nitpicking; i suppose the moral ambiguity is something that simply cant be solved, and that the author made it that way purposfully.

Ding ding ding ding ding. Alan Moore is like that.

This has got to be the most boring MoS thread of mine. Ever.

Lol

depends. do you consider intellectual debates that attempt to probe into a great work of fiction boring?

Yes. Especially when those debates are happening in MoS and in my thread(:

I find them boring on here. I hear and am apart of enough debates in real life. Its called having a really intense father and 3 brothers. We talk and debate about a lot of things. I get sick of it.

Hm. well, that's where your previously stated philosophy of "Hey, it's mos, it's ok to go off topic" Backfires on you.

But then I can have my thread closed and you can open one of your "mature" discussion threads 8DD