TRIPLE POST (unless someone is gonna post before me while I type this).



Who did you vote for then, Vasu?

That doesn't mean anything. You could have noticed that and taken advantage of it.

My apologies. :o

En. And this time, it's going to begin with either B or D (or something else.) :tongue:

But.. why wouldnt the "real" human say something if it really wasnt blah that voted for Hrae?

That "real" human should know for sure that Blah is lying...

Blah has been quite consistent to say Hrae was a legal hence the vote..

While Hrae randomly said that he voted for En....... hmmm.........

I thought Dyna was suspicious too but he said he voted for Ralath.. and same theory if he didn't / couldn't have voted for Ralath someone would know they're lying and at least said something?

Okie dokes. Now I'm also suspecting you as Legal, because you're trying to prove me wrong and no one really bothered to (other than Hraes.. but that's because I'm saying he is Legal, so it's normal for him to argue back). Of course, you could be fair, but no one else really had a downright opinion on what I said, just pretty much not sure whether I'm right/telling the truth or not.

Another reason is that I'm wondering why the Legals did not finish you off. I'd say you're pretty good at debates and you should be on top priority of their murder list!

THAT ASIDE!

1. Alright, there is no proof that I voted for Hraesvelg. HOWEVER, there is evidence that I voted for Hraes, while there is none for Hraes voting for En. I made at least one post about voting for Hraes before Day 1 was up, yet Hraes did not make a single post about En.

2. I see that you questioned my trust on Dyna's vote for Ralath. I trust him because of the same reason my vote for Hraes should be trusted. No one else said they voted for Ralath.

3. Everyone who said voted En is already suspicious. 5 people (Hessah, Tama, Esen, Hraesvelg, and you) said they voted for En, when there's only four votes. Already 1 is lying. Actually, IF Jikanu and Ralath voted for En (since Ralath died and he's a human and he didn't voted for Hessah/Hraes/himself.. and I'm just guessing Jikanu really did vote for En, I dunno) then there's already potentially 3 liars in the 5 people I listed.

My vote for Hraes and Dyna's vote for Ralath have no contradictions. Yet there is suspicions on who really voted for En.



There is no proof for anything like Hraes said, but if I were not involved, I'd take a jab at voting for hraes (since there's potentially 3 Legals in the 5 people I listed, and 3/5 is a pretty good chance), rather than a 50/50 chance at voting for me.


Besides, I dare a Legal to say they voted for Hraesvelg, Hessah, or Ralath. Legals did not lie about voting for them because since only 1 human voted for each and if they lied, the real human who had voted for either of the three would instantly know the other is a Legal. Even if they won't be able to prove anything, the risk is still too big to take. However, saying that they voted for En would be a much safer option (the only option left, I'd say).

edit:

WEWT that was long! Btw I hope I'm not starting to sound serious, just that it's getting exciting since I feel like I'm going somewhere now!!!

Maybe the "real" human is dead? Maybe lvra voted for Hrae? He's not allowed to say who he voted for now, so it could have been him, I guess. But yeah, I suppose Hrae is suspicious too.

I don't think lvra got the chance to vote at all.

11 people started the game, lvra got murdered, that's down to 10. 10 - 3 legals = 7 votes.

So yep, he didn't get to vote.

he didnt get to vote at all coz he was dead before any votes started~

Okie dokes. Now I'm also suspecting you as Legal, because you're trying to prove me wrong and no one really bothered to (other than Hraes.. but that's because I'm saying he is Legal, so it's normal for him to argue back). Of course, you could be fair, but no one else really had a downright opinion on what I said, just pretty much not sure whether I'm right/telling the truth or not.

You should know I'm debate hungry and love to point out fallacies in logic. But then again, I can't expect you to trust me. As for the other points you made, they are kinda valid I guess. So go ahead and take the stab, and I'll take mine (Not necessarily at you). I must say, people saying who they voted for makes this extremely easy. I think I might stab a legal this round.

Pwa~

That's true, though. There's a lot of hints when it comes to when you know how many votes have been made for a certain person etc.

But then again, would taking away that element make it too hard to find out who the legals are? The votes and posts were the only thing we could work with... posts alone doesn't mean anything since we all could be lying. If there's nothing to work with, then it's all gonna be just random guessing D: