![]() |
You are right, Manz - just woke up from a nap and didn't put my brains back in yet. OK, this will be good then.
|
Read it wrong. Nevermind xDD
|
Which part of this description says anything about using a hat?
In fact, let me highlight: Quote:
I'm not complaining about being killed; I actually think it works out better this way. But I am questioning the mechanics of it. |
Ghost is boredd...
Ghost is out!!! NightNight:zzz: |
The legals had one legal send in the votes together. Teva decided there was no point in asking.. "Who would you like me to kill?" or whatever. Did the hat maneuver and that was Teva's final decision. It makes sense, really.
|
Quote:
Let me phrase it this way: If 1 person was voting for the Bomb, and the Bomb exploded, who would it kill? That one person. IMO, the less the game uses a hat, the better. The hat relies on chance and that kind of goes against the idea of this being a strategy game. |
The legals all talk about who they should kill next in PMs. Then they have one send in the votes. I think Teva was thinking, "They all want the same person to die anyways(They're a team). They should all have the same chance of getting killed (by the bomb.)" =\
|
I dun remember where I read it then. I'm pretty sure I read somewhere that someone said it was chosen by hat. Either in post, or in a PM when I was legal. Can't remember.
|
Whoever sent the kill pm should have died by the bomb
|
Quote:
But your logic doesn't work for the human side (all the humans are a team, they should all have the same chance of getting killed by bomb). Clearly, the order of the votes and who casts the vote matters. Quote:
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 04:32 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.