I'll counter your points with reasonable facts.

1. I havent "been saying anything at all" because no one seems suspicious to me yet. Whoever the legels are, they're playing a pretty good game this round, and not budging an inch.

2. when the hell have i wanted to know who anyone else is voting for? and how is that a sign of a legel? all i've asked is if that there's anyone suspicious so that my vote could acctualy be worth something.

3. i HAD said that i didnt find cillia suspicious several times before in the past. check back if you need to. and once again, not the sign of a legel.

4. ...Hasnt everybody? you guys convicted Cillia for the same thing and she was Healer Julia, not a legel.

5. Idk when i tried to "buddy up" with hessah, but kirby formed an alliance with ME early on, not vice versa. And i only said that vasu was a good detective because he was the first one to go through and list the suspicion levels of everyone else >.>

6. How did i act weird about it? i just didnt know that they had lost it o.o

All your points are baseless and without any real point. If you vote me out, fine, but you'll be voting out a human.

Well i know I'm human.

there are 4 humans 2 legals 1 ST and 1 Phino

we have a 50-50 shot

but than again if we don't hit one of the baddies it's possible the humans are done for.

I pick you.

who do you pick?

If we kill off another innocent we're just hastening or deaths. we need to look at the evidence and decide together. i'm gonna look through the forum and see who i think it is.

At this point, hessah seems to be the most suspicious. She attacked cillia baselessly.

Please stay on topic

Sparky, gtfo of the thread if you're not gonna play the game or speculate on it.

Lirange asked you nicely. I dont wanna deal with it. dun really care if it hurts at this point, as you're just trolling right now.

*sigh* he deleted the posts so now i look like a schizoid... Alas. Anyway, back to the topic at hand: Manz, are my assertions at all true?

Jik is getting a bit too protective o-o

I was getting my hair cut and I just couldn't get the cilia vote problem out of my head. My question who would lie about voting for cilia when they did not? The assumption is it wouldn't be a legal because that would point the finger at the discrepancy but why would the phino do it?

There is only two reasons one is to make them look suspicious and then get voted on thus winning. But that makes it look like they want to be suspicious therefor making people not vote for them. The only other reason phino would lie about who they voted for is to cover up who they voted for because it would make It obvious that they were phino. So what kind of vote would make it obvious that you were phino?? A self vote! If phono voted for themselves they could not say that they voted for themselves. So if we look at the person who is missing a vote they must be phino.

Here is the gambit I propose and LEGALS you better listen up. We need to vote off someone other than hessah because she is phino in this scenario. Than the legals have to vote off hessah. If they don't than we vote off hessah next round because she is legal.

Of course this is all with the belief that my logic is correct.

What say you all