No. Spagghetti was a man-made invention, therefore negating the possibility that man could be created by spagghetti.

I counter that God was also a man made invention, hence negating the said possibility, which is the whole POINT on which the FSM was invented.


EDIT: Also, how do you know spaghetti didn't exist way before man, and man in his pitiful intelligence think that he had invented it? After all, he is capable of anything with his noodly appendage.

Ah, but is there any proof that God is a manmade invention? there's proof that man created pasta, therefore throwing more odds on my side than on yours.

And you fail to consider that God made us in his image and as a reflection of himself, not the otherway around. if it WAS the other way around, people would've probably created him as a form of gargantuan beast, considering the psychology of the times; the "my God is stronger than yours" mindset.

Counter Edit: because man created spaghetti long after first being created himself; if spaghetti had existed before, we would've discovered it long before.

Yes, but there is still a possibility that they are right, right?


Which is what plenty of religions did.


That's what you THINK, but like I said, he is capable of anything, including hiding from us the recipe for delicious pasta until the time was right. After all, the world was created just 500 years ago by the FSM, not a lot of time.

*shrugs* It's a possibility, though a very small one at that, especially since it was created with atheists who wanted to defuse all religion, and was meant to be a parody.

And do you think Hinduism has a similar probability with all it's elephant headed gods and contradictions and meaningless rituals?

i've never studied Hinduism deeply, so i cant comment on it. my knowlege on it exists entirely of what i learned in 6th grade.

But you just said that all religions had the same chance of getting it right.


And besides, Pastafarianism was invented by deeply touched believers who had a chance to look at his noodly greatness.

that's false, acctually, since you said yourself that pastafarianism was made to point out what they considered flaws in religion. However, them making it was their own biggest flaw in their attack.

and i didnt say that i felt Hinduism was wrong, i simply cant comment on it since i havent studdied it deeply and dont know about any of the supposed contradictions you brought up.

Yeah, but I'm not a pastafarian, so who am I to say?


Well, I could bring them up if you wished, but it seems kinda pointless since you don't know much about it.


Oh, and I'm sorry to be naggy, but I can't remember and can't find how you responded to the making a stone so heavy thing. Can you remind me?


Aaaand it's late, so I'll be back tomorrow.