>_>

<_<

I have awful summaries? :sad:

Dunno.

I, however, will force them, because I'm too lazy to press any buttons to read about what people did when I scan the recent changes.

And Hyper has 100% edit summary usage, whereas hyperswoss only had a 47% edit summary usage.

>_>

Mebbe I should create a new account.

Nub.

I only have 99% use of edit summaries, don't feel bad.

We all make mistakes.

Boooo~

It'll take me 5000 more perfect edits until I can get up to 99%.

100%? Hell yes. :sunnies:

Ha, that nub hyperswoss. I've been told that most of his edits were adding icons or table data... Bleh. It starts out with "Icons for _______ added.", then becomes "More icons...", then is "Same.", "Again.", and eventually fizzles out to "_____". xD

...or so I've been told.

And THIS is the reason, I do not edit the Wiki. I give my info to Icy and Triumph and they can put what they want, haha. :laugh:

^LOL! Spirit's being lazy! ;D

Tri, question... If I put a space (Hypothetically. I no do dat.) in the summary bar, will it count as a blank edit, or a summarized one? o:

THat's not fair... i didnt know about edit summaries till like... only recently...

i bet you my % is like... LOW.....

and Ditto Icy.. that's a BIG guideline... for something simple?

Do we just say "Changed quest reward for lvl 64" as edit summary.. isnt that enough?

I can answer this one for you, whatever you put there shows up as whatever you put there. A blank shows up as a blank (as opposed to nothing at all showing up as nothing at all).

Triumph, he would just say 'Updated.' in the summary.

You should use keywords, and edit sections rather than entire pages when possible; most of the time 2-3 words in the summary will give an indication of the nature of the change. Whoever is interested in the detail can compare difference themselves. You don't want to make people lazy, right?

Mandatory edit summaries are not something that can be forced through.