Question to Icy & Tri:

Assuming the Mysterious Feather quest is one that you can't even see to start...

Should we remove that quest from Wiki? It's irrelevant and misleading to leave those in there...

Ones that we can start but can't finished should be marked (Bugged), but the "delinked" and "unobtainable" ones (ones that a normal player wouldnt even know it existed)... it doesnt apply to us.... should be left out?

As I have Yet to put wrong information into the wiki, and I am currently at 80, along with the fact that I have a list of the quests that are listed in the wiki and I can plainly see any discrepancies, and the fact that requests for help editing the wiki have been numerous, I do not see the problem with me changing the things I find wrong. :smarty:

As a mod of this forum, I am not going to intentionally put misleading information in the wiki. Not only that, but I double-check and recheck my information before putting it in there. :love:

I take pride in this entire forum including the wiki. I have added tons of information so far (all correct) and will continue to do so. You can be assured that anything I change in the wiki will be the correct and most up-to-date information that is available to the area I am changing. :cutielove:

This post is not meant to sound harsh if it does. Please keep that in mind. :smile:

So then Spirit, exactly because of that, I don't ever click on the little (diff) next to every one of your edits.

However, bearing in mind that the wiki is a lossy decentralized input free-for-all a lot of edits are anonymous and remarkless, maintaining the accuracy of information in an article is more difficult than adding. Now, what is the point I was trying to put across.

If you spot a mistake:
1. Should it be minor, correct it
2. If you cannot be entirely sure, make a comment or simply make an edit in good faith
3. Otherwise, leave it be, and comment on it in the Discussion page instead

And for those see-no-touch quests, consider this: there's a lot of information in the wiki that is preemptive. I believe it is enough to make a note about it.

What you will be doing is basically making one verification of the list, and it is not so different from what I suggested. I will also suggest that you place an extra tag, |Date=YYYYMMDD in the list. This won't be displayed, but it allows one to see whether the information may be outdated.

I edit based on what I know and have found out. I take no information from anywhere other then the game. I'm more consered with getting all the missing data filled in then keeping the data up-to-date. I do that everytime there is a update to the game. It really does not take much to update new things if you go about it the right way. The hard part is watching all the edits others are making to ensure statablitiy in that.

Icy got the gist of it. However, I would suggest something like a little bolded "(Bugged)" or "(Unattainable)" or whatever synonymous word the majority decides upon to inform the public of the current status of the quest. Keep it uniform, though. I dunno if Icy hates them, but I didn't mind them.

I guess Unattainable is better than "subject to change" =D

I would put it as (Unattainable) Name, just add (Unattainable) before you type the name in the quest. That would tell everyone right at the start that they can not obtain the quest.

Example:
{{Quest
|Lv=11
|Name=(Unattainable) The Mini Greenkie
|NPC1=Robin
|Task=Defeat 15 Mini Greenkies
|Exp=216
|Money=90{{c}}
|Fame=8
|Com=Repeatable quest
}}

But this is just my 2 coppers, I'll let Icy or Triumph make the final call on it.

I agree with Gandafa's 2 coppers~

Question: Does the level you receive a particular quest vary from class to class?

Nope