OK, thanks for the info. That kinda bites, though. I rushed to get my last turn in tonight when I could have gone a few more days. Oh well, I hope he doesn't drag it out......

Yeah. xD

I don't like waiting either... cos it takes too long.

http://www.fiestafan.com/forums/arca...ourney&tid=595


OK, now can I say that it's bugged? :laugh:

Fixed xD

Thanks, you rock! :laugh:

http://www.fiestafan.com/forums/arca...ourney&tid=597

pigspark should be through, unless he didn't play all 5 games. I know it says 5/5, but I played only 4 and it says 5/5 for me too. So.. is it bugged or not? o_o

More than likely he did not play all 5 of his games. Even if you have the higher score, if you do not play within the alloted number of days, it disqualifies you. Looks like that is what happened with him.

Okay, thanks.

Personally I don't find that fair. Not just the fact that a higher score could be DQ'd because of inactivity but because of how the system could be played.

Suppose you have two people in a game in which whoever spends the most time playing will win(I.E. it's neigh impossible to lose).

So the first person plays and gets a score and the next person beats it and so on.

Now let's say person A has played 4/5 rounds to reach a good score to win. The person B plays the 4th round just so he won't get DQ'd and to have(if neither play) person A need to play before him.

Basically if one person has a lower score but doesn't have to play before the other person he could just wait until one got DQ'd...In this sense people would wait the entire round back and forth making one tourney last a month.

But duration really isn't the point here is it? He would have been given a reminder after 3 days. If he wasn't going to be able to log on, he should have completed his games.