that's not saying "Evidence or no evidence." Its clearly stating that there is NO evidence. What i was saying that what i said there must have been SOME evidence.

Our evidence lies in the actions of the players; the way they act sometimes gives stuff away. it gave me a way a few rounds back, because i was being too quiet and bandwagon-ish.

You have to bold the whole thing if you want to quote me:

"And there's no such thing as "evidence" in this game. It's all by guesses. We only have "evidences" if we have another special human role to prove it."

I said there can be "evidence" if we have a special human role to prove it. So like I said, in this game, there is either evidence (by special human roles) or no evidence at all.

I see evidence as concrete proof. No such thing as concrete proof with player's actions, because they can easily be faked by the players. Even if we vote by watching players' actions, I call that guessing, and not by following "evidence" or whatever.

You never know in this game, sometimes the quiet ppl are legals, sometimes they're not. I dont really think your a legal but i did forget you and secbro were in the game :zzz: i almost never remember people in the game once they get quiet, and i was only pointing out you were quiet because you were mentioned, and i realized that you were in the game still
Like i said, you people have been confusing my brain this round. I was originally going to vote for Ralath, but after reading some of the posts between the two of you, i didnt know if that was the right choice. So i just flipped a coin and it was heads, which is what Blaaaaah was.

HA! I was right! Take that Ralath!

Blaaah is up next for me, if I survive the night.

If I die, it doesn't mean that legals are setting secbro up k? Don't hesitate to vote for him! hahahaahha.

That's still how the game was played for the last 17 or so rounds.

Your insistence that actions mean nothing is a bit suspicious for me. i'll unite my vote with secbro on this one.

But was it not Blaaahs idea to vote Ralath ? why would she, if she was a legal, try to kill another legal ?
I think Jik or sec are legals.

I thought of killing Ralath. Not blaaaahs. And I'm human so...yeah.

Not saying Blahs or Sec is a legal for sure... But a reason for suggesting to kill another legal would be using one legal as sacrifice to save themselves. It's been done before, haha.

Hmm... about the whole evidence thing, sometimes there is something but usually I don't think so, haha. Without the other roles that would find things out, unless someone let something slip unintentionally, it's mostly guessing. Actions can be interpreted differently, and sometimes people get the wrong idea.